And permantly disfigured even more with long COVID.

They knew what would happen. The US is wealthy with a huge military force. They could have locked down and mobilised their army to protect people until it was over.

But the oligarchs didn’t want to slow their profits and give up even an inch of their wealth and power, so COVID was allowed to run rampant. They sacrified their own people to the virus. These people did not willingly sacrifice themselves, they were killed through purposeful negelect.

They also encouraged other countries to do the same. My own country hardly had any deaths before US officials visited and pressured them to open again.

It’s no longer tracked properly so who knows the full extent of the death.

This could be one of the largest mass killings in history.

The worst part is when the news tries to spin how traumatic it was for kids to endure our pathectic excuse for a ‘lockdown’, instead of how traumatic it was to watch our countries murder millions for nothing and hear our friends and families parrot eugenics talking points to try and justify it.

EDIT: [CONTENT WARNING] There is a blue MAGA from another instance in the comments who is hand waving away peoples COVID experiences, so if you have lost a loved one to this disease or had your life or loved ones affected by it, reading the comments here might stir some trauma. Just a heads up.

    • Rod_Blagojevic [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      74
      ·
      1 year ago

      Remember when it finally became undeniable that China had done a better job responding to covid so the NYT started pushing the idea that China didn’t care at all about mental health. It was essentially, “they showed us how to successfully contain covid, but at what cost?”

      • SeventyTwoTrillion [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        1 year ago

        “they showed us how to successfully contain covid, but at what cost?”

        the anti-China rhetoric obviously started pre-pandemic but this shit is when it hit comically deluded levels. BAWCing at every single moment that China did anything to stop the spread of the virus or the deaths of people while simultaneously going “Well, those million people were all going to die anyway, because they’re old!!!” truly should have gotten every single journalist who peddled that bullshit fired.

        (out of a cannon, into the sun)

        • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          There really aren’t many professional journalists left. The profession has been utterly mauled, and it started years ago, more than a decade I think. Most of the people writing now aren’t journalists, and the ones who are lack the resources that made any degree of credible reporting possible in the past. Go look up how most newspapers have shut down all their foreign offices and investigative offices. Most news now is either re-worded reuters and ap briefs or just reading off government and corporate press releases.

    • duderium [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      “China’s lockdowns destroyed its economy even though its economy has regularly outpaced the USA’s by three or four times since the pandemic began!” maybe-later-honey maybe-later-kiddo frothingfash

      • Barbariandude [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        I did see some fairly compelling studies at the time I could dig up again about Russia’s vaccine only being 60% or so effective. Still, something is better than nothing, and the shameless cash grab from Bill Gates over vaccine patents was sickening.

          • Barbariandude [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            I just went to google scholar to get the study, and apparently I’m very wrong. It was 87% effective at preventing hospitalization with 2 doses and 97% effective with 3. Either I accidentally swallowed some propaganda, was misinformed, or this study is wrong. I’m leaning towards the 2nd option.