Josseli Barnica grieved the news as she lay in a Houston hospital bed on Sept. 3, 2021: The sibling she’d dreamt of giving her daughter would not survive this pregnancy.

The fetus was on the verge of coming out, its head pressed against her dilated cervix; she was 17 weeks pregnant and a miscarriage was “in progress,” doctors noted in hospital records. At that point, they should have offered to speed up the delivery or empty her uterus to stave off a deadly infection, more than a dozen medical experts told ProPublica.

But when Barnica’s husband rushed to her side from his job on a construction site, she relayed what she said the medical team had told her: “They had to wait until there was no heartbeat,” he told ProPublica in Spanish. “It would be a crime to give her an abortion.”

For 40 hours, the anguished 28-year-old mother prayed for doctors to help her get home to her daughter; all the while, her uterus remained exposed to bacteria.

Three days after she delivered, Barnica died of an infection.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    2 hours ago

    A texas woman didn’t die, a texas woman was murdered by the state’s ignorant, bigoted, christo-fascist policy - abbott, patrick, cruz, gohmert, that cock eyed AG and the rest of them along with every complicit texas republican voter… they all have blood on their cowardly hands.

  • BigMacHole
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Leaving Children without a Mother while also killing the Fetus is called being PRO LIFE and PROTECTING THE CHILDREN!

  • ConstableJelly@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    87
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Many noted a striking similarity to the case of Savita Halappavanar, a 31-year-old woman who died of septic shock in 2012 after providers in Ireland refused to empty her uterus while she was miscarrying at 17 weeks. When she begged for care, a midwife told her, “This is a Catholic country.” The resulting investigation and public outcry galvanized the country to change its strict ban on abortion.

    But in the wake of deaths related to abortion access in the United States, leaders who support restricting the right have not called for any reforms.

    My country’s aptitude for remaining entirely unmoved by preventable tragedies that utterly upend political trajectories in other nations has become one of our most globally defining traits.

    • qevlarr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Supreme Court scandal
      Gun violence
      Police brutality
      Politicized natural disaster relief
      Food insecurity
      Homelessness
      Drug epidemic
      Pregnancy mortality
      And, last but not least:

      Fascist attempted coup

      America: 🤷‍♂️

    • Billiam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      edit-2
      17 minutes ago

      Many noted a striking similarity to the case of Savita Halappavanar, a 31-year-old woman who died of septic shock in 2012 after providers in Ireland refused to empty her uterus while she was miscarrying at 17 weeks. When she begged for care, a midwife told her, “This is a Catholic country.” The resulting investigation and public outcry galvanized the country to change its strict ban on abortion.

      And that’s the difference between a sane country and America. We don’t even blink when children are murdered in schools- we sure as shit aren’t going to do anything about dead women.

  • LANIK2000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Omfg I get it now… “All life is sacred” as in all life must feel the fearful embrace of God.

    I was gonna put a “/s” at the end, but I’m honestly not too sure anymore… Seems like that’s exactly what they want. Like what’s the point if not the cruelty?

  • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    256
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    there’s another thread about outsiders’ criticisms of lemmy, and one of the comments mentioned that it’s “unwelcoming to right wing viewpoints”

    I WONDER FUCKING WHY

    • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Right-wingers don’t have viewpoints. Fascism is not a legitimate political position. It is a threat. We don’t call a serial killer’s propensity to kill a “viewpoint”. Conservatives have motives, not viewpoints.

    • uis
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      5 hours ago

      > Talks against healthcare

      > Wonders why nobody likes those speeches

      • noneya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        60
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        1000%. So long as right-wing equates to racist, seditious, traitorous bastards, then yeah…you’re not welcome here or anywhere else in this country. Go find Jesus or something.

        • dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          5 hours ago

          yeah, definitions are hard, but in general I tend to think of the right as promoting traditional hierarchy and the left as being egalitarian.

      • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Most right wingers think their views are legitimate because the right wing exists as the direct opposition to the left. But i think that view is warped.

        We need to start considering right wingers as extremists and not the opposition. They should be outliers on a spectrum where the left is much more central and the right is much more to the extreme right

        |----------------------------------------left wing----‐-----center----------------------------------------right wing--------|

        Like that

        They think their views are as right as ours are left. If they were, they would likely be welcome here.

        • dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I don’t really see what is wrong with authentically egalitarian politics, so I’m inclined to think the “center” is just a euphemism for right-wing.

          If a left wing movement fails in its egalitarianism, like when the USSR had slave camps, then I think we should not think of that movement as left wing at all, it just fails the definition of being left wing.

          The common response to this is that it is a form of no true scotsman fallacy, which I think could be a legitimate concern since you might define a left wing ideal as the definition and anything failing to live up to the perfection of that ideal is not “left”. But on the other hand, I don’t know how else to consider some politics authentically egalitarian and worth supporting and others inauthentic or corrupt and embodying hierarchical or right-wing tendencies. Maybe there is no bright line we can draw or reduce to a logical equation, but I would like to think there is still some value in evaluating which politics to support (i.e. which politics are furthering egalitarian means or ends).

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      101
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I wish the world was unwelcoming to right-wing viewpoints. This is the result and so many people are fine with it. It’s so depressing.

      • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Unfortunately you’ll have to get used to it and continue challenging them. The polycrisis is only going to get worse and the number of refugees from the impact of climate change and climate change related causes i.e. conflict from collapsing food / water access and / or failed states.

        In the next 10 to 20 years life quality will peak and then will start collapsing over the next 50.

        When that happens a significant cohort of the population will close ranks and want to “protect” those closest around them, the desire the ultra-rich have for isolation will continue to trickle down into the rich and remnants of the upper middle class as the wealth gap widens. In times of crisis this cohort pushes further and further right.

        So keep working against these forces so we can get the rich to pay their fair share to fix these problems but be prepared to take up arms when the house of cards that is the relative stability we have now collapses.

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Paradox of tolerance. They aren’t welcome because they tend not to play nice with others.

      I feel genuinely bad for the non-facist conservatives, but today they’d be called leftist too, so I think it’s still fair to say it really shouldn’t be welcome anywhere because the term has become very extreme.

      • TheOneCurly
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        6 hours ago

        “non-fascist conservatives” have spent the last 40 years obstructing and cozying up to fascists rather than play well with others. They knew what they were doing.

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Or, to be as charitable as possible, they’re useful idiots who are lazily unaware of how heinous the people they’re blindly following are.

      • frunch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 hours ago

        This is how it works though, right? They keep ostracizing groups until they run out of out-groups to attack and the next round begins. The old inner circle is now the circle and a new inner circle is proclaimed, the new outgroup(s) are revealed, and the feeding frenzy continues.

        This is what always baffles me about minorities that are staunchly Republican. They’re actually voting for themselves to be put on the chopping block (just not right away)

        • Billiam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 hours ago

          This is exactly why fascism is ultimately self-defeating. The only question is how many people get hurt in the meantime.

    • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The hospital’s hands are tied by dystopian laws - this is what “pro life” looks like.

      These are becoming way more common the more we let this right wing evil shit sink in.

      • mostdubious@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        4 hours ago

        they don’t mind killing you and your loved ones for their beliefs. what use is there in taking the high road with them? pacifists will lose this battle.

        • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Right, I don’t disagree with you, but there is no legal ground on which to sue the hospital. They acted as they were legally required, the law will be on their side. I’d say go after the politicians involved for wrongful death, if it weren’t for qualified immunity.

          Honestly, I just hope anyone able and willing to leave such shithole states are able to do so, although that’s obviously much easier than done. Their leadership has clearly failed them and does not care about them. :(

        • SoylentBlake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Agreed. Idealists blind themselves to the fact that on most battlefields the rules of engagement are defined for you, not by you.

          And there’s no such thing as a war crime. War is what we call conflict after social order has broken done. If there’s no social order, there’s no law, simple as that.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Greg Abbott and Donald Trump should be sued for maliciously causing death.

      • ArtificialLink@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 hours ago

        “I swear to fulfill, to the best of my ability and judgment, this covenant: I will respect the hard-won scientific gains of those physicians in whose steps I walk, and gladly share such knowledge as is mine with those who are to follow. I will apply, for the benefit of the sick, all measures [that] are required, avoiding those twin traps of overtreatment and therapeutic nihilism. I will remember that there is art to medicine as well as science, and that warmth, sympathy, and understanding may outweigh the surgeon’s knife or the chemist’s drug. I will not be ashamed to say “I know not,” nor will I fail to call in my colleagues when the skills of another are needed for a patient’s recovery. I will respect the privacy of my patients, for their problems are not disclosed to me that the world may know. Most especially must I tread with care in matters of life and death. If it is given me to save a life, all thanks. But it may also be within my power to take a life; this awesome responsibility must be faced with great humbleness and awareness of my own frailty. Above all, I must not play at God. I will remember that I do not treat a fever chart, a cancerous growth, but a sick human being, whose illness may affect the person’s family and economic stability. My responsibility includes these related problems, if I am to care adequately for the sick. I will prevent disease whenever I can, for prevention is preferable to cure. I will remember that I remain a member of society, with special obligations to all my fellow human beings, those sound of mind and body as well as the infirm. If I do not violate this oath, may I enjoy life and art, respected while I live and remembered with affection thereafter. May I always act so as to preserve the finest traditions of my calling and may I long experience the joy of healing those who seek my help.”

        • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Instead of blaming doctors for not martyring themselves for the Hippocratic oath, we should be putting the blame on the lawmakers that created this scenario to begin with.

    • catloaf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      5 hours ago

      By who, the state of Texas? This is what they want to happen.

  • 2ugly2live@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Both sides are the same. It can’t be any worse with the Republicans in office, so just don’t vote. That’ll show 'em. /s

  • Aviandelight @mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    121
    ·
    7 hours ago

    This is fucking barbaric. The hospital let her sit for 40 hours with a fetus hanging out of her uterus. Just take a moment to imagine what that alone must have felt like aside from the emotional horror of losing a pregnancy. We wouldn’t even imagine treating pets or livestock this way but it’s clear that these repugnant forced-birthers don’t consider women to be people. One little pill to speed up the labor that her body already decided was needed was all that was required to keep this woman alive. What’s the point of even having healthcare when we can’t rely on it.

    • noneya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 hours ago

      God. I agree. This is horrific. And we have the audacity to consider ourselves a first-world country. Texans should immediately take themselves to the state house to demand better. Our tax dollars pay for hospitals to treat us, not to kill us.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Republicans: “God’s will.”

    As long as there was no abortion, their view is she deserves it.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Fuck your God.

      Well, actually there is no god, or gods, but you know, fuck your idea of what a God would be like

    • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Its funny how religious people love invoking their holy books to justify hatred and violence while ignoring the parts explicitly saying to not judge others and that human life is more valuable then any commandment from god (also the torah/old testament allows abortion in many cases). Its almost as if those “religious people” don’t care about religion and just want an excuse to hate.

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Not only will they not care, they will dismiss it and joke about it. From the article (regarding a different woman who died from being denied life saving medical care):

      Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp called the reporting “fear mongering.” Former President Donald Trump has not weighed in — except to joke that his Fox News town hall on women’s issues would get “better ratings” than a press call where Thurman’s family spoke about their pain.

    • Fester
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      8 hours ago

      There’s always an acceptable number of deaths with the GOP. It’s just happens to be infinite when it comes to healthcare, pandemics, poverty, guns - basically anything that won’t result in punishing innocent brown people. In that case the number is extremely low.

  • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Disgusting that a life was lost over a “person” that would have never existed. This is doing wonders for the birthrate they are so worried about. I wonder if they just assumed this only effects the poors cause wealthier people would go to less restricted hospitals.

    • Tyrangle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I don’t know why but “person” in quotations just rubs me the wrong way. I don’t think we have to dismiss the value of an unborn life in order to support abortion - they’re not mutually exclusive. In this case I would argue that there were two tragedies, one committed by “God” and the other by the state of Texas.

        • Tyrangle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I think I’m just sensitive because I’m pro-choice but constantly get painted as heartless and uncaring by my pro-life family. Viable or not, I feel something for these unborn things, just like my family - the only difference is that I don’t prioritize my feelings over the rights of other people, nor do I shy away from the fact that abortions can be necessary and merciful. I am an ally in this fight, but if you’re dismissing the miracle of life as nothing more than a medical condition, you’re not helping the cause - to some extent you’re a liability to those of us trying to actually win people over.

        • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          That’s why I put the quotes. Some people may call it a person. I don’t. That was me trying to respect the other side.