Summary

Two Pennsylvania voters, Austin Gwiazdowski and Jeanne Fermier, received $100 checks from Elon Musk’s pro-Trump “America PAC” despite not signing the PAC’s petition, which was required to qualify for payments.

The petition aimed to gather support for the First and Second Amendments and facilitate pro-Trump outreach.

Both voters expressed confusion and refused to cash the checks.

The PAC, funded by Musk, mailed 187,000 checks as part of efforts to boost Trump’s Pennsylvania support, while Musk’s political influence continues to rise.

  • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Lol what? Can you seriously not copy and paste 18 U.S. Code § 597 into any search engine for the internet?

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      How do I find the official source tho? The internet is full of misinformation and google loves to send me to content marketing third party untrustworthy trash.

      Yes, you should always post a link to the authorative source

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        They are literally citing the law. That’s better than a link because links change all the time, but the citation remains valid because it’s referring to a code section and not some ephemeral html.

        Depending on what you’re looking for (law or regulations), the official sites are code.house.gov or the Electronic Code of Federal regulations (ecfr.gov).

      • Lennny@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        We’re not going to handicap ourselves because you have an aversion for googling. Learn to research. It’s legal code…gee I wonder if a .gov link might be legit.

        • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          You’re on a link sharing website saying you dont want to share links. Is this your first time on the Internet?

          Welcome, we share links here.

          • Sludgeyy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            It’s not that you asked for a link, it’s your low effort way of asking that implies you are already skeptical of the information.

            “Hey! I googled to look for it and I’m having a hard time finding where it officially says the statute. Mind sharing a link?”

            They probably would have said “No problem. Let me google that for you. Here…”

            • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              6 hours ago

              I’m not asking for me. I’m trying to let you know that you should always cite your sources. The link is something you should always provide when you quote something.

      • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        The official source is the US government…which is why they cited 18 U.S. Code § 597

        Honestly, it should be self explanatory that is laws/codes would be from official American government websites.

        Normally i would agree that links should be provided but if someone’s cites a specific law/code, the government site (state or federal, depending on what’s being cited) should be the immediate source of information.

      • spongebue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        While Google has been circling down the toilet lately, if you at least try searching for what you want, and use half a brain to think about what you’re looking at, it’s not exactly super difficult. I have to Google similar stuff for work sometimes, and .gov is pretty much a sure thing that you’re getting a government source, which is pretty good when you’re looking for a government’s laws. I also get different major colleges, which is just as good. Especially since you’re reading legalese, not commentary on the law or whatever.

        • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Or we can all do our duty to each other and share authorative sources to fight misinformation

          • spongebue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I’m a random guy on the Internet. Frankly you should be doing your due diligence the same way you would on a Google search result anyway.