• PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      They/them is not used exclusively to refer to neuter things, so enbies not being gender neutral is irrelevant here. ‘They’ is a useful and pre-existing catch-all.

      • rxin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        they/them is what I hope we all eventually settle on as standard for NB gender identities.

        This part is the one I’m referring to. I’m not opposed to they/them — it’s good, but I don’t think it’s fair to reduce enbies to just “they/them”.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          49 minutes ago

          … why?

          Is that any more absurd than “reducing males to he/him” or “reducing females to she/her”?

          It’s language, not a campaign medal. You don’t need a separate example for every instance.

    • FoxyFerengi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Non-binary is a broad spectrum of identity. What you’re suggesting only works for identities like genderfluid or demi-gender people.

      I’m agender, which exists outside of the male-female binary (in which you are either one or the other). Agender and it’s derivatives, like gendervoid, are completely gender neutral. I only use they/them because it’s really difficult for the average person to not use a pronoun when referring to me, I very much prefer people using my name in place of one.