• TachyonTele
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 hours ago

    It’s one of the best RPGs in the last decade, easy. Unless you already know how pathfinder works, it’s going to take longer than two months to beat it. There’s an insane amount of gameplay.

    • Shou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Ahh… i remember kingmaker. 200 hours is what a single playthrough took. Wrath of the rightuous improved greatly upon the previous game.

      • TachyonTele
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        I’d add probably 30-50 hours just figuring out what classes you want to play. Then spells. Then actual game mechanics. So that’s puts a safe starting point for a full run after 150 hours.

        Then add the 200 single playthrough to that.

        I got a little upset when then released Rogue Trader, just because they finished their new game before I finished my first lol

      • Poopfeast420@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Yeah, 220 hours for mine, including the DLC campaign. Game is a buggy mess though and not properly balanced, especially near the end. As long as WotR improves at least those things, I’d be happy.

        • SolOrion@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          33 minutes ago

          not properly balanced

          IME, that’s just the dangers of running Pathfinder. There can be such a disparity between a well built character and someone just going through character creation picking random stuff that it’s hard to balance for both possibilities. As a DM, I’ve always kinda played it by ear and tried to have some way to scale the difficulty on the fly built into as many encounters as I can.