• Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    m simply stating the observation that there are other nationalities who not only might serve as a spark or derivative for whatever the American media

    What does this have to do with a discussion about North Korea as presented by American media? You are not engaging with the argument or the points, you are not even relating it to your own, you are instead reframing the discussion to be about something else - You are moving the goalposts.

    Never did I imply I was only talking about things because America was the one doing the narrating though.
    dawg your alleged sources were all American media.

    Oh hey you managed to find one whole article! Good on you! Is that article the sources you mentioned? I just wanna be sure that I’m not missing out.

    • Call me Lenny/Leni
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I never said this discussion necessitated the American media, as opposed to just their doings, did I?

      • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You initiated this with the framework of American media. Now that that media has been critiqued, you are trying to reframe the discussion to one that is being more general, rather than actually engage with the argument put forth or acknowledge in any way what I have been saying. You are not engaging with my argument, you are trying to avoid it by making the discussion be about something else.