Female soldiers face rampant sexism, harassment and other gender-related challenges in male dominated Army special operations units, according to a report Monday, eight years after the Pentagon opened all combat jobs to women.

U.S. Army Special Operations Command, in a lengthy study, reported a wide range of “overtly sexist” comments from male soldiers, including a broad aversion to females serving in commando units. The comments, it said, are “not outliers” but represent a common sentiment that women don’t belong on special operations teams.

“The idea that women are equally as physically, mentally and emotionally capable to perform majority of jobs is quite frankly ridiculous,” said one male commenter. Others said they’d quit before serving on a team with a female, and that serving in such a situation it would create problems and jealousy among their wives.

The blunt and sometimes crass comments ring familiar to many who have watched the difficult transition as women moved into the military’s front line combat jobs. And they paint a disturbing, challenging picture for leaders.

  • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    As if these serial cheaters and their Jody fucking wives actually give a shit about women on their teams.

    Any spec ops dude that wants to bone will just go find literally any other command and fuck their women, not having them on the team isn’t stopping them.

  • Space_Racer
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    SOCOM has always been a boys club and consistently shows rampat toxicity and unprofessional conduct. Idk what they expected. I’d argue that a majority of the crazy right wingers from the military are specifically from SOCOM.

  • AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    I mean what the fuck were they expecting?

    I know maybe I should but it’s impossible for me to have sympathy for the ladies who signed up to the murder squad so they could legally murder people.

    • Venutianxspring@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m not supporting the military, or many of those that join, however the world’s fucked up and there’s lots of people that join so they can get free school and the opportunity to get out of the trailer park. Not every military person is a blood thirsty psychopath.

      • BoofStroke
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        You don’t need to be specops to be in the military.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    WASHINGTON (AP) — Female soldiers face rampant sexism, harassment and other gender-related challenges in male dominated Army special operations units, according to a report Monday, eight years after the Pentagon opened all combat jobs to women.

    U.S. Army Special Operations Command, in a lengthy study, reported a wide range of “overtly sexist” comments from male soldiers, including a broad aversion to females serving in commando units.

    However the negative sentiments revealed the 2023 report echo sharp opposition voiced by special operations troops across the services in 2015, when surveyed on whether women should serve in the dangerous commando jobs.

    The Army study focused on women serving in operational roles such as Green Berets, Ranger Regiment, aviation and psychological and civil affairs teams.

    The study and meetings, however, also included women in a wide array of support jobs such as engineers, mechanics, fuelers and communications and intelligence personnel who work with or sometimes accompany commandos on missions.

    Women said they fear reprisal and don’t trust commanders to take action because of a “good ol’ boys club.” And female officers said they’re told to develop a “thick skin” so they can survive in a man’s world.


    The original article contains 1,174 words, the summary contains 194 words. Saved 83%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    The US is built from European stock and the whole project is one of violent and brutal oppression. It’s never going to get rid of that heritage. Turtle Island will have to be decolonized before women in the military aren’t seen as objects to dominate. No idea when Europe will change, though.

    • Novman@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Quite racist remark against european, no wonder why many european sees anglosphere with contempt. As other people were not violent or oppressive.

      • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        France, England, Spain, Portugal, The Netherlands, Belgium, Germany. All of them were brutal colonialists all over the world. Even Denmark and Sweden had overseas colonies. All of these were founded on the belief that it was the proper thing to subjugate entire continents, steal their resources, commit mass murder and even attempt complete extinctions, enslave anyone you couldn’t kill, use r*pe as part of proto-eugenics, then later engage in actual eugenics. And all of this was founded on misogyny. Show me a European country that maintains an unbroken historical tradition of women as the highest elders or show me a European country that has restored women as the highest elders and you can prove me wrong.

        • Novman@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Turkish empire, Mongols, Chinese, Arabs , Zulu Empire, Atzecs, Japanese empire. Found in those empires the good matriarcal society. Gengis Khan is a good start. At least starting to study history is a good start.

          • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            Nice whataboutism. Yes, you can read Wikipedia, but historical analysis isn’t about what names are listed under a topic in an encyclopedia. The difference between those empires and the European empires I listed are as follows:

            A) the European empires subjugated 80% of the world’s population.
            B) the European empires invented the concepts of racialized capitalism that dominate the entire world today.
            C) the European empires still exist.
            D) where the European empires no longer exist in direct occupation, the relationships of subjugation and extraction still exist in the exact same places. E) the European empires have killed orders of magnitude more people than all other empires combined and the killing is continuous to this day.
            F) the genocide of the European empires is still happening to this day.
            G) all anti-imperialist struggles happening around the world today and for the last 50 years have been struggles against the European empires.

            None of these can be said about other empires. So quit your whataboutism. Just because Gengis Khan existed doesn’t make the currently ongoing 600-year European imperial project any better.

            • Novman@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              I don’t feel ashamed by european history and americans are the last people that can teach ethics to the world. What i see is an hatred against european people and the only thing that i understand is that for some american people, europeans are their enemies and subhumans. This explains perfectly how usa do everything to make european colonies poorer and less populated.

              • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                10 months ago

                I don’t feel ashamed by European history

                That’s sort of all that needs to be said. The European colonial project is the deepest wound currently affecting the world’s people and subjugated 80% of the world’s population in a brutal, racist, misogynist, genocidal regime of hyperextraction, extinction, and devastation. If you don’t feel ashamed of that, there’s not much else to say.

                The USA, Canada, and Australia are European settler colonial extensions of the brutal history of Europe. Europe set the indigenous genocide in motion. That the USA decided to create a distinct political regime that broke from Europe does not in anyway break the actual historical lineage with Europe. Even today many of the leaders of America trace their roots to European aristocracy and royalty.

                Europe is THE scourge of the world’s people and has been for 600 years. That’s not racism. Europeans invented racism. Fighting Europe is anti-racism. Getting Europe out of where it violently inserted itself is anti-racism. Extracting everything Europe stole from the rest of the world and leaving Europe impoverished is anti-racism.

                • Novman@feddit.it
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Don’t project your hate and the crimes of your government on other people ( btw, what polish or swiss or romanians have something to do with colonialism ). You are very racist against a continent and his population, this is clear about your words.