The two ways they have for getting source code are kind of funny and easy, and kind of makes fun of RHEL in pulling this maneuver, getting so much community backlash and ultimately having so little effect other than to negatively impact future business. But will they go further to violate the GPL? Or concede defeat? Say what you want, but to cut off paying customers if they share source code which is their right under the GPL is a really bad move that exposes the character of those running the company.

  • kamin@lemmy.kghorvath.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just FYI “Software” in that agreement specifically refers to Red Hat branded software, so it isn’t quite as clear cut if you debrand it before redistributing it.

    • redcalcium@c.calciumlabs.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      People said the subscriber agreement applies to the RHEL source code because the source code for specific RHEL releases can only be downloaded from the subscriber portal now. Especially this part:

      (e) using Subscription Services to support or maintain any non-Red Hat Software products without purchasing Subscription Services for each such instance

      But yeah, we shall see if Red Hat would actually enforce that as many people feared.