• tburkhol@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, BMI was openly developed, is systematically calculated and described, has been open to evaluation by experts for decades, and has been part of hypothesis development for similar decades. It is, in fact that systematic study that revealed where its use as an estimator or predictor of health had been overstated.

    When science falsifies a model, it does not retroactively make the model pseudoscience.

    • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The ongoing adherence to it after being falsified, repeatedly through different studies, applies to BMI, which qualifies it as pseudoscience.

      So you are correct, falsification does not make something pseudoscience, but that’s not relevant in this case.