• boredtortoise
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    For their brand of humor, this one is actually pretty funny (and blatant so it works in text).

    But it’s very probable that it will draw comments actually advocating for atrocities

    • Armen12
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      God I hate that 40 IQ monkey

      Actually that’s an insult to monkeys, who are much more intelligent

      • Aabbcc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        He doesn’t think about you at all

      • JasSmith@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s really something for everyone to hate. His faux socialism shtick doesn’t work so well while he whores himself out like the good little capitalist he is.

  • Draconic NEO@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s almost like they’re trying on purpose to be as inflammatory as possible, I know they’re not and they’re 100% serious which makes it even crazier, I mean this is the kind of shit edge-lord teenagers say, just goes to show just how sad and immature these losers are.

      • manapropos@lemmy.basedcount.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        The US dropped two nukes on Japan, invaded Vietnam for no reason, instigated coups in a variety of sovereign countries and committed countless other atrocities to sustain the military industrial complex. That’s a lot more than some 3000 deaths

        • IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          The same thing can be said about Japan. A lot more people died by the hands of the Japanese Empire during WW2 than those two nukes did.

          • HerbalGamer
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Still, dropped it on two civilian targets.

            Imagine Russia taking out LA and NYC; you guys would never let anyone forget that no matter what

              • HerbalGamer
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                Agreed, not a good thing. Abu Ghraib ring any bells?

                See? We can do this all day long but in the end the fact is that these “tactical nukes” weren’t used to take out parts of the command structure, but to vaporise not one but two major civilian population centres.

                • PugJesus@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Agreed, not a good thing. Abu Ghraib ring any bells?

                  That’s not even fucking close.

                  but in the end the fact is that these “tactical nukes” weren’t used to take out parts of the command structure,

                  Hiroshima and Nagasaki were both chosen for their military and industrial importance.

          • 520@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Who the actual fuck was saying that?

            They were saying that compared to the damage the US has inflicted on other countries, including innocent civilian populations, the damage done by the 9/11 attacks is much smaller

    • HipPriest@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think you can really compare terrorist acts on a tit for tat basis. Two wrongs don’t make a right. The last 20 years has proved it didn’t really achieve much good for anyone ever, just a lot of bullshit.

      Like were the people who died in 9/11 directly responsible for the horrible shit their government did? No.

      Why was the attack not on a political building anyway?

      • Sassy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The Pentagon is a government building. Everyone seems to focus on the towers and forgets American Airlines Flight 77.

        Regardless, the point of terrorism is to cause terror, not necessarily to kill people who “deserve” it.

    • PugJesus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh, good, whataboutism for terrorist attacks by Saudi extremists on unambiguous civilian targets. Guess this is left praxis now.