• Vlyn@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    131
    ·
    1 year ago

    This isn’t about “good credentials”, the person making the post was actually an animator for Invincible (where the image is from).

    So it’s the artist posting a meme with their own art from a series, someone accusing them of stealing the art (saying they are as bad as AI) while the artist was actually part of the team that made the series. What is there not to get?

    • Damage@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And aside, memes are memes, that specific image conveys a concept in a way that another, custom made, image wouldn’t.

      • ArthurParkerhouse
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        But couldn’t it be easily inferred from the right-side of the image?

        • systemglitch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I explained that in another comment. I thought the humour was supposed to be that he could do art but choose to use someone else’s art.

          I’m not good with riddles.

    • Xanvial@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      That the image is from anime called Invincible, sorry not knowing that

      • TheGreenGolem
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        1 year ago

        I didn’t know that either. It was more than obvious from the context.

        • Dudewitbow@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          By the japanese definition it is. It isnt by the bastardized western definition of it.

          • Syrc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s not “bastardized”, it’s what “Anime” means in English (and arguably every non-Japanese language). It’s a way to differentiate them, like here in Italy we call US cartoons “cartoons” instead of the Italian word for it.

            • Dudewitbow@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Because people decide to colloqiually change what it means in context, but the problem is, most people cant even agree on a definition of what is and isnt anime because there usually exist some counter example to show that that focused definition is incorrect.

              For example, if someone defined it by being animated in japan, Batman the animated series, would be considered anime due to it being animated by Sunrise (which shares the same art style to The Big O, an Anime). Its a borrowed word whose definition was changed from the original definition because people are too lazy to say japanese animation. You them go through the rabbit hole of what would you call animation studios that are purely outsourced.

              While other countries animated studios already have their own word for their animation (Aeni for Korea, Donghua for China), the choice for japans is breaking its original meaning.

              • Syrc@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                I think most of the anime community agrees on more or less MAL’s definition: “An animated work created in Japan for the Japanese market”.

                Sure, there’s animation studios that outsource a lot, but it’s usually just inbetweens, rarely Key Animation. Directors, screenwriters and other positions are almost always Japanese.

                • Dudewitbow@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Has exceptions, where some anime like Cyberpunk Edgerunners is primarily designed for westerners, and published on a western companies streaming service(netflix). Is Edgerunners not anime?. Like i said, there are always exceptions to more strict definitions that arent the japanese one. Keep in mind, thr average japanese person hasnt even remotely played or heard of cyberpunk 2077. Japans pc business isa growing market by still severely smaller than other asian countries, and home console adoption in japan is low. (And abysmally low if you count xbox in japan) Cp2077 is also not on the switch.

                  Then you have examples that are not as favorable in japan and run because they are extremely popular outside of japan like Vinland Saga. Is Vinland not anime because the target audience is mostly people outside of japan at this point.

                  • Syrc@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    CP2077 even won GOTY in IGN Japan. And yes, Pc and Xbox aren’t that common, but PS4 is extremely widespread. It was definitely a success in Japan as well.

                    And both Edgerunners and Vinland Saga launched with a Japanese Dub on Japanese platforms. They might’ve bet more on the oversea market to get the budget back, but they were still made as products to be watched in Japan, unlike Batman, My Last Day or other “borderline” cases.

      • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not at all, but this is how this sub works. It usually goes:

        1. Person A posts something

        2. Person B tells them they stole it or have no clue about the topic

        3. Someone brings up that Person A is actually the owner of the thing, or a leading expert in the field (see the right side of the the meme in this case)

        4. (optional) Person B finds out they are dumb and apologize

        • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          And at no point does OP actually explain what the fuck is going on, just act smug when we don’t immediately know what they’re on about.

      • samus12345@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You’re expected to infer that it’s from one of the shows listed on the right, both because the creator’s name is listed there and because the community’s name is “Don’t You Know Who I Am?”

          • TheGreenGolem
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Fair enough, but it was also a reference to Archer, a joke if you will.

            On the OP. I went from top left, than down, then to the right. Saw the meme template (I didn’t know what was it from), and read the replies. I saw the imdb page and thought “Oh, this meme must be from that show and he wrote it. Burn! Hah. That’s funny.”

            And that was it. A fairly certain conclusion given the context.

      • Elivey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I literally had never heard of Jessie Lam, or seen or heard of the invincibles before this post. I inferred that they were one of the artists for that show based on the words and context in the images in the 12 seconds it took me to read it.

        You’re just dumb, sorry buddy.