In the years following the 2013 debut of Adult Swim’s cartoon phenomenon “Rick and Morty,” its star and co-creator Justin Roiland became a titan of the animation and video game industry and a rock star of youth counterculture. His artistic style and caricatures became ubiquitous in cannabis culture, and his career expanded into producing other animated series, creating NFTs and leading a virtual reality gaming studio. In 2017, a “Rick and Morty” collaboration with McDonald’s led to such a viral frenzy that police had to be called to at least two locations.

But as he partied with Los Angeles’ superstars and traveled the country for conventions, he also found he could use his fame to strike up conversations and develop relationships with young fans, including some who were underage. This is according to interviews with 11 women and nonbinary people who shared thousands of messages with Roiland from 2013 to 2022 — with nine of the people saying he turned the exchanges sexual. Of those nine people, three said they were 16 when they started talking to Roiland. To corroborate their stories, the 11 women and nonbinary people also shared pictures, videos, social media posts, emails, and plane ticket and Uber receipts with NBC News.

Warning: Lengthy and graphic details

    • detalferous
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      99
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, this story needs way more precision than it has.

      “Were 16 when they started texting him”. Ok, well how old were they written the allegations occurred, and what is he alleged to have done?

        • BillyTheSkidMark
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not to defend it, but in situations like this I think they have to be vague for legal reasons. There’s a fine line between reporting the news and defamation (regardless of how true it is).

          It’s bullshit, and people will use defamation and lawyers to attack people accusing them. But I can see why you’d want to be extra careful how you worded the title.

      • DarkGamer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        46
        ·
        1 year ago

        Seems like he waited until they were 18 before meeting them, although he would send sexually-charged texts to women as young as 16.

        Roiland usually asked people how old they were, if they were single, and if they were “into girls.” In three cases, when the person said they were under 18, Roiland would message them again months or years later. Those three conversations started with people who said they were 16 at the time, and continued for years, until they were 18 and older.

        • CorruptBuddha@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          So did he actually groom them? Because the way this is written it sounds like he asked them their age, and then waited for them to be legal, which is creepy, but I wouldn’t call it grooming.

              • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                I think it’s Betrayal at House on the Hill where you lay out all the tiles to build the house, and one of them has permanently become the Statutory Corridor according to our house rules (because we’ve misread it so many times).

            • CMLVI@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              16
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I think you’re missing the double negative I used. Lol I’m saying that even if someone is above the age of consent, statutory rape is still an applicable charge.

                • CMLVI@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Take it up with Virginia; age of consent there is 15. Intercourse with a minor above 15 as an adult can still give you statutory rape charges, as referenced here: “The age of consent for intercourse is 15 years old in Virginia; however, there are other sex acts that set the age at 18. These acts include cunnilingus, fellatio, and anal intercourse, which means that minors cannot legally consent to certain sexual activity. Additionally, if you are an adult and have sex with a person under 18 years of age, you may be prosecuted for statutory rape. Statutory rape is generally charged as a Class 4 Felony, but the exact charge and penalties will depend on all the factors and ages involved.”

                  Pulled from https://www.roanokecriminalattorney.com/how-does-virginia-define-consent/

                  It isn’t always the case, generally age of consent precludes it, but not always. Age of consent isn’t a get out of jail free card. Additionally, it doesn’t specify about relations between people in positions of power.

                  It’s all moot anyway, Roiland lives in CA, and he was inviting a 17 year old to his house in Los Angeles. Age of consent there is 18. Did he assault her? No, but what 36 year old man is inviting a 17 year old to his house? Multiple other reports of girls at 18, still in high school, also receiving advances from him.

                • CMLVI@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  There is further conversation with another user below this, but that isn’t the case in some places, namely Virginia.

                  Additionally, statutory rape isn’t just bound to age of consent. There are myriad other statutes it can apply through, namely family, age difference, and positions of power over minors above the age of consent.

    • pips@lemmy.film
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Literally in the second paragraph of the article and the summary at the top of this post.

      But as he partied with Los Angeles’ superstars and traveled the country for conventions, he also found he could use his fame to strike up conversations and develop relationships with young fans, including some who were underage.

      The article then goes on to discuss his conversations with underage fans. The article uses “young” because his conversations with of-age but teenaged fans were also bad.

      • thomcat@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The fact that these women and enby folks were underage is like the most important part of the story. Calling underage girls “young” and not correctly calling them underage in the title of the story is called burying the lede.

        Justin Roiland used his ‘Rick and Morty’ fame to pursue young and underage fans, text messages show would have been a better title.

        • pips@lemmy.film
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          For most people, except apparently many in this thread, “young” heavily implies underage. When character limits matter, it’s okay to start by saying “young,” which is accurate, then clarify further in the article.

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Lemmy has an unusually high concentration of people who have an inability to understand context.

            For example, every joke, the top comment is “I don’t understand, can someone please explain?”

            • pips@lemmy.film
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I tend to give jokes a pass. Humor is often contextual and cultural so some jokes really do require an explanation.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Per the article, he explicitly did not pursue underage fans, though.

          Roiland usually asked people how old they were, if they were single, and if they were “into girls.” In three cases, when the person said they were under 18, Roiland would message them again months or years later. Those three conversations started with people who said they were 16 at the time, and continued for years, until they were 18 and older.

        • eric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think you must have missed their last sentence. The title uses young because it wasn’t just underaged girls he was texting, and texting the 18 and 19 year olds at his age is also a pretty bad look.

    • andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Still creepy if not illegal at just above 18. Turns out he was more than just creepy though.

    • RazorsLedge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Underage” in which locale, and for what? If you’re referring to age of consent, 16 isn’t underage in most places, as it shouldn’t be.

  • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    160
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    From the article, really buried: “Roiland usually asked people how old they were, if they were single, and if they were “into girls.” In three cases, when the person said they were under 18, Roiland would message them again months or years later. Those three conversations started with people who said they were 16 at the time, and continued for years, until they were 18 and older.”

    After reading the whole article it doesn’t seem like he did anything sexual with anyone under 18. My takeaway is that he’s a creep, abuses his fame and power (part of a big club there), he’s manipulative, and he plies underage people with alcohol to get them to sleep with him, but it appears he’s not a pedo. Or at least smart enough not to get caught.

      • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        146
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Don’t mistake my comment as a defense of him as a person. He’s been accused of domestic violence, forced oral sex, and taking advantage of intoxicated women under the drinking age. Despite him getting off on the DV charge, where there’s smoke, there’s fire. He’s obviously a pretty terrible human being.

        I just don’t like people throwing around ‘pedo’ unjustly, because it waters it down and takes away the impact when used against even worse monsters.

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Even the “forced” oral sex seems really suspect.

          But he should have been able to read the situation as well as anyone. If she seems to be setting a trap, maybe don’t fall for it?

          Either way, the dude seems to be tiptoeing around the borders laws that nobody should be near. Dude’s sitting and watching the clock for when his prey turns 18. Even if he might comply with the letter of the law, he’s clearly violating the spirit.

        • arin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          16 is not prepubescent which is what pedo is there is another term for teens but i forgot.

    • treefrog
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      And continued for years is the key.

      He made sexually explicit comments to minors for years. And solicited pictures? That’s solicitation of child pornography

      The guys a pedo. Rather or not he gets charged with something related to under age girls, we’ll see.

    • Alien Nathan Edward
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      https://www.sportskeeda.com/amp/pop-culture/who-allie-goertz-justin-roiland-underage-girls-dm-screenshots-surface-wake-musician-s-accusations

      According to the screenshots shared by Twitter user @/MartyAmericaUSA, Roiland asked the minor to run away from school and go into “sx slavery.” He also allegedly addressed her as a “ft btch,” called her “jailbait,” and said she would go into “cam w*ing” once she turns 18.

      A Facebook user called Janna Waters also claimed that Roiland texted on Twitter when she was 16 and called her “insanely hot.” The user also alleged that the Rick and Morty co-creator allegedly had a “predatory scout” named Christy who used to find “young girls who looked a certain way” for the creator.

      No, dude’s a pedo. “Starting the conversation” with someone who’s underage then waiting til 5 minutes after their 18th birthday to make a move doesn’t make you not a pedo, it makes you a pedo who doesn’t want to go to prison. Even then, there are at least two documented cases where he didn’t wait. Because he’s a pedo.

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No he’s a pedo that just barely skirts the law so he doesn’t get gang raped in prison.

    • Orbit79@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      1 year ago

      You say he abuses his fame and power. I don’t really see and power accept money and fame. If people are attracted to fame and power, then why should he not be allowed to use his? Why is that different than a woman who shows off her breasts to get a date?

      • Neve8028
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        You don’t see why unbalanced power dynamics lead to abusive situations?

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t really get the people that bitching about using their fame to get laid either. Are we only allowed to date within our own social class? If they’re being coercive, yea, that’s a problem but it’s possible to have a relationship without coercion.

        I’m not defending this dude but the problem with him was that he was pursuing minors not that he was famous and successful.

      • kbotc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        63
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Dan Harmon was super problematic in his own way. His difference was he apologized to the people he wronged in a way that they accepted, and seems to have changed his behavior. His change in behavior seems to be part of what left Justin out to dry as Dan no longer came to work intoxicated, but Roiland just kept doing it.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Well the subtype of funny that Rolland had (and Harmon still has to a degree) had was from being creative and weird and sad. Smart, dark, absurdist, existentialist humor. I think that’s a pretty reasonable way to roll it up.

        Edit: crossed the names up, derp

  • popemichael@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This really has me wondering how many people are doing the same thing but haven’t been caught.

    • Pillarist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      A person who otherwise wouldn’t be noticed suddenly getting attention they never received thrown at them can easily abuse it if they don’t control their behavior with a moral compass, which is becoming less and less a priority. When something feels good, many indulge. When you overindulge, you justify. When you get good at justifying, you can make anything okay in your head. If you don’t have a line drawn, it’s wild how far people will go… he went way too far and he should endure the consequences.

      • agent_flounder@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think getting to be super famous is much easier if you have no moral compass to begin with.

      • iegod
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I contend it’s not that it’s less of a priority but rather we’re (as a society) getting better at collecting evidence, identifying un aceptable behaviour, and taking people seriously when they present an accusation. I firmly believe humans have done and do worse all the time.

        • Pillarist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I agree, actually. It’s actually unreasonable to think people were any better or worse before, there’s always good and bad… The difference is what’s accepted by the rest of us. Great response, I appreciate it!

    • Aux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Everyone is doing that. That’s the whole point of being famous.

      • cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        Women DM famous people all the time and randomly fuck them. I personally some that have done it. They are just like meet me at this hotel.

        • bitsplease@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Which there’s absolutely nothing wrong with, provided both parties are over 18

          No one is upset that he fucked fans, there upset that he at least tried to fuck underaged fans.

          Frankly if you don’t see a difference, I’m scared for you

          • DarthBueller@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Plenty of folks arguing now that literally any imbalance of power is unacceptable – I’ve heard people argue that it is also not time-limited. So rich people can’t fuck poor people, a professor can’t ever fuck a former student even if they meet years later at a conference, and don’t even think about workplace romance ever again if you are talking about college educated folks. The insane rules mean that you’re only allowed to date someone precisely the same as you in every way. These are the same cis het allies that helped alienate and target the trans community through absolute absurdity.

          • Aux@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh muricans… Have to be 18 to fuck and have to be 21 to drink. The hell is wrong with you, prudes?

          • cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The comment chain didn’t imply any of what you said about my comment. You’re putting words in my mouth, I’ll leave it at that.

  • maniajack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Glad to see more reporting on this. The way they swapped out Roiland’s voice in Solar Opposites was absolutely perfect, it really hasn’t lost anything imo.

    • Custoslibera@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I still fucking laugh thinking about it.

      It was so unexpected for me that they would make a change to a hoity British accent and just run with it like nothing happened.

      Brilliantly handled. I’m actually looking forward to how they are going to make the change for Rick and Morty now.

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      “This is what my voice sounds like now. I don’t care if it’s jarring, get over it. And that Voice Changer Ray had chronotons in it, so this is what I’m gonna sound like in flashbacks too. You got a problem with that? Then tough shit, it’s called science!”

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wait, he was voiced by Roland? I thought they were just taking a shot at Roland and Rick and Morty, that’s 10x funnier

  • chaogomu@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Grooming is more than just convincing a minor to not tell their parents.

    The actual definition is grooming a minor for a later sexual relationship (not fully restricted to them still being a minor)

    As with any scummy/horrible behavior, there are levels of scum/horribleness.

  • dethb0y@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I just assume anyone remotely famous is some kind of foul person behind the scenes.

  • Velociraptor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Imagine being so lucky that you become a household name off of animation of all things but then deciding to do exactly what John K did. At least Rick and Morty won’t go the way of Ren and Stimpy. Not yet, anyway.

  • Codex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I just watched a great documentary on YouTube about Ren and Stimpy and it’s fucking sad how similar the story with John K is as well. I should think there’s some obvious lessons about not giving immature manbabies unlimited power in here, but it’d be nice if somebody actually learned them!

  • rab@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Didn’t this story already come out like a year ago? Adult swim fired him