• boonhet
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Didn’t they switch away long ago because performance?

      • ex_redditor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Anybody can make a twitter that can handle 100 users. The challenge is making worth at the scale of twitter

        • Snapz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sure, but the “scale of Twitter” becomes a more and more accessible goal by the day. elon fires everyone and intentionally breaks everything while only new feature releases are “new and exciting” paid tiers of horseshit that nobody wants. I’m not paying a penny for the privilege to yell into his sad, shrinking room with the remaining 17 nazis, 4200 corporate brands and 1.75 million bots that are left to make up its userbase.

      • boonhet
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ah yeah, probably because Twitter was originally written in Ruby on Rails and it’s always nice to do exercises that feel like something real. But yeah, making things actually scale is pretty difficult and they felt they had to move from RoR to something else (Scala in this instance).

        Of course, Elon Musk probably fired everyone responsible for making it scale properly, so at this point, stopping the growth of Twitter is probably good, because otherwise it might run into issues again.