• immutable
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    259
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    People that are upset about electron should consider it’s not:

    Electron App vs Wonderful Fully Supported Native Linux Application

    The reality is that your choice is largely:

    Electron App vs No App (maybe running their windows app in wine if you can get that to work)

    It’s not like companies are going to go build a native linux app but electron got in their way. It was always electron or no support.

    So if you like the app, remember that the ram and the cpu you paid for doesn’t provide value unless it’s doing something. There’s no trophy you get at the end of your life for “most cumulative ram left idle”

    • Shatur@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think proprietary Electron apps better run in browser anyway because of trackers that you can disable via extensions.

    • mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      So if you like the app, remember that the ram and the cpu you paid for doesn’t provide value unless it’s doing something. There’s no trophy you get at the end of your life for “most cumulative ram left idle”

      This is a damn homicide lmao

      • KSP Atlas@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        Running electron apps becomes a genuine ram issue when running heavy ram workloads like running heavily modded games

      • samson@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        And very true. 32gb is 99 dollars Australia pesos, 16 is about 70 percent that. What a waste to let it sit around.

          • samson@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ve never had a problem with the speed of an electron app be it steam or Spotify.

    • crispy_kilt@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s no trophy you get at the end of your life for “most cumulative ram left idle”

      Some people like to use more than 1 app you know.

      Also, RAM is never ever idle. It is used as filesystem cache when not used by programs thus speeding up read accesses significantly.

        • crispy_kilt@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Alright, let’s nitpick! No, it is never ever idle, every few cycles is a refresh cycle, which is work.

          • nicoweio@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s great that you mention this, but this is a different layer of abstraction than what we were previously talking about.

      • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Honestly even with more than 1 application open it shouldn’t be an issue. Maybe with a really old computer, but anything modern really should handle an electron app just fine

      • crispy_kilt@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’d prefer that. One firefox instance can easily run 10 big fat websites while using like 6GB of RAM. 10 electron apps on the other hand? 32GB RAM won’t be enough.

      • MyFairJulia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Electron IS a browser. It’s a Chromium browser to be exact with all the Chromium UI elements except the very bare minimum removed.

        So the only difference that remains is running a website in a tab or in a fancy window.

        • rumschlumpel@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          Deutsch
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I know that Electron is a browser. But the issue is that it’s a different browser, and AFAIK Electron applications don’t share libraries etc. like Chrome/Firefox tabs would, which makes Electron apps even more inefficient than web apps.

    • Pechente@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, there’s also Tauri which requires slightly more testing since you actually use the device’s built-in browser, so there might be differences. The upside is a much smaller bundle size, quick start-up times and often less RAM usage than with Electron.

    • ky56@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      What about laptop battery life? More CPU usage = less battery life. WHY DOES NO ONE GIVE A FUCK ABOUT BATTERY LIFE???

      The single most reason I switched from Spotify to Apple Music is that I was sick of seeing the Spotify macOS app at the top of the “High Battery Usage” page on Activity Monitor. I also actually noticed less battery life. Fuck Electron. I avoid apps made in it like the plague.

    • nitefox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      lmao, yea. Besides, it’s not like electron is that bad either. We aren’t in 1990, why would you care if electron uses a gb of ram or ten processes or this or that… they think that native means good, but more often than not native means a shitty ugly unusable application that will work (not really) just on windows

      • MyFairJulia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        If a fancy text editor starts eating hundreds of megabytes RAM without having loaded a file, i think we did something wrong.

        Though Visual Studio can do that too without Electron.

        • rambaroo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          VS Code is low than a text editor these days. It’s frequently used as a full fledged IDE now.

        • nitefox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Have you ever had, in good conscience, a problem caused by an electron app using too much resources?

          Because we are, again, in 2023: the standard is 16GB of RAM, with CPUs much more powerful and with a lot of more cores and thread per cores than the past. Complaining about a PC resources being used when these doesn’t actually create a problem is like complaining about GUI being bloat; or JS/CSS being bloat.

          This of course doesn’t mean electron is perfect, cause it clearly isn’t, but it’s a good enough solution that can be iterated upon (see Tauri) and improved (the DX on electron is shit). Nor that every app should be in electron.

            • rambaroo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I run slack every day. It’s a bit slow sometimes but it doesn’t cause any real issues. Still better than teams. I’d rather have it as an electron app than as a web app.

              VS Code is electron but it’s not meant to be a lightweight text editor like notepad. Must people are using it as an IDE at this point. Can you explain what’s “bloated” about it?

              These apps probably wouldn’t exist at all if it wasn’t for electron so I’m grateful for it. The purists can pound sand like always.

            • Starman@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              on the vscode comment, that’s just plain wrong. here’s vscode opening up on a base model m1 air (it’s a test project but my works codebase also opens just as fast)

              https://imgur.com/a/q6iw2Bk

              on a 8gb ram m1 air, with 3/4 chrome windows, slack, postman and two node processes running. as for slack, i agree its not as snappy as say, native macos apps but it doesn’t really bother me a lot.

          • MyFairJulia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            It didn’t cause problems since i have a lot of RAM but i still hold the opinion that just because we have a lot of RAM, we don’t need to waste it. We could keep being efficient about it and get even more out of the same amount of RAM, you know. That said, if Tauri lowers the RAM usage of the same applications i’m looking forward to it.

            • nitefox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Your kernel allocates all the ram anyway lol, it literally changes nothing to you

                • nitefox@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  that would change nothing to you. Unless they are seriously consuming a lot of memory and filling up processes while not needed, then it’s fine. Otherwise it means the app was developed by a bunch of monkey, but that could happen - maybe even more likely - with native software as well.

                  Tldr: to the end user it changes literally nothing nowadays, to the companies and the devs it changes quite a lot. And to some degree, end-users won’t have to deal with shitty ugly apps (unless the designers are jerks, in which case you are probably working in the same company as me)

          • Neko the gamer@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            not everyone can afford 16 GB of RAM though, if you want to make your software accessible write it to work on as many systems as possible with few or no slowdowns or hiccups. Electron is a shitty bandaid because you’re a lazy ass that doesn’t want to write more efficient software for desktop and instead you keep making web applications running natively, which is and will always be wrong

    • TheOPtimal@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      ქართული
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even native apps usually use cross-platform toolkits which usually have very good Linux support. E.g. Qt, .NET, WxWidgets, GTK (maybe)

    • 30p87@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t hate that electron is used for everything, I just hate electron itself, mostly. Starting with that it’s memory consumption, measured at the example of Discord (though that may be not 100% accurate as they use a custom version), is higher than just using a separate FF instance, with a separate profile. Works for Discord and Spotify (though spotifyd + spotify-tui is better anyway). Signal etc. is still only available as an electron app.
      The biggest problem I have with electron is more of a problem with Nvidia though - combining Nvidia + Wayland is bad enough, especially for windows refreshing below 60 Hz, as this causes them to flicker as in letting stripes of the wallpaper through. Electron apps are even worse, not only do they start to flicker as whole after not being in focus for 10 minutes, which is very annoying with them on other screens, but they also start to ‘lag’, as elements don’t update fluently. That affects EVERY chromium based program - including steam.
      We were so close to a much better version of electron. Mozilla just killed off the concept of a separate engine, like chromium is, due to issues with low demand but high cost and instead only has the main FF repo now. A separate FF engine would very likely mean a FF based electron alternative would be built by the community. Bug free, fully compatible with everything, not under Google’s control.

    • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      So if you like the app, remember that the ram and the cpu you paid for doesn’t provide value unless it’s doing something.

      It could be doing so much more if you hadn’t gone with Electron you fuck

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          From the comments that have mentioned the efficient programming languages, my guess is there’s a bunch of devs in here that never got past the “c++ is hard!” stage.

          The first time I saw an office app launch in my browser, I was both impressed that they got excel to work in a browser and appalled that they wanted excel to work in a browser at the same time. And I’ll admit that it does perform well considering it’s running in a fucking browser, but I’ll still launch the native app any time I actually want to work with a file that’s opened in the browser.

            • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Keep at it, eventually things will click and you might find yourself appreciating the compiler errors and type strictness. Perhaps you’ll even spend time getting rid of warnings even though it will let you run without doing that, because they indicate edge cases that might break your program in difficult to debug ways.

                • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yeah, time is always the hard part.

                  It’s all kinda the same btw. Like you’ll have different sytax and styles, but most languages have variables, loops, conditionals, functions, objects, inheritance, APIs to access OS functions like files and network, etc.

    • uis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      remember that the ram and the cpu you paid for doesn’t provide value unless it’s doing something.

      Remember that house you paid for doesn’t provide value unless you fill it with elephant shit.

      That’s consumerism. Another equally shitty statement: your liver doesn’t provide value unless it dies from all toxins in the world.

      • Cralder@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        You know that “no app” and “not using the app” is the exact same user experience right? So you can just not use the app and stop complaining about it existing.

      • bitsplease@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Idk who you think you’re speaking for, but I don’t think it’s as many people as you think lol.

        Besides an electron app you don’t use and no app are literally the same thing, so why choose nothing?

                • monk@lemmy.unboiled.info
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The same reason why webapps are a bad idea. We’ve built monstrous browser engines to do fancy stuff to pages in a bonkers language in a sandbox, and the resulting abomination is neither pages nor apps. And now we’re like: we have so much expertise in shuffling page parts around to look like they’re apps, let’s build “real” apps out of them. It’s like rejecting headphones and towing a car with broken windows around with you just in case you’ll wanna listen to music: it technically works, but makes negative sense.