whywhywhywhywhy vote

che-cigar Votes are earned.

  • RollaD20 [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Nah, I just don’t think any law that purports to be pro-trans necessarily is a good idea. Sometimes laws can be written poorly and not take into consideration how fascists could use it to hurt people. Have you read the law? Newsom’s response? Can you tell describe to me how it helps and how it definitely won’t backfire?

    You’re the newsom/dem supporter; you tell me. How does vetoing a bill that was largely supported by its constituency protect trans kids? Is even this limited bourgeois democracy too much for you? Seems authoritarian to me. Also, how does this track with this statement at the end here.

    Socialist organizing is pro-state. I’ve mentioned repeatedly that I think organizing is pretty much the most important way to change the future, I just don’ t think doing so in a pro-state organization will lead to the best outcome. States don’t give up power, I’m not interested in getting my guys into power, that’s the mistake of history. Nobody deserves power.

    ‘Socialist organizing is pro-state, but organizing is important.’ wtf? How can you even marginally support the dems if this is your ideology? So you don’t think people should organize around socialist concepts? what kind of anarcho-communist are you? because even if you decry all extant orgs as “statist” presumably you are organizing (if you actually are) with leftists… every socialists/communists/anarchists who I have organized with wouldn’t bristle at being called socialist in a casual context. You clearly don’t understand why leftists engage in electoralism, especially when there isn’t a good chance of them winning. Do you think that voting for 3rd parties in the presidential is to get elected? If it happens that’s great (it won’t), but it is primarily to spread your political message, the majority of the work of any well-meaning left org is not electoral, it is on the ground and in the community. I don’t understand how this specific action is pro-state outside of some of the participants not being anarchists. Leftists should support leftist political projects and parties and not the political parties of empire. I don’t understand why this is so fucking hard to understand.

    Yes, because math matters, individual votes matter that’s why billions are spent to influence individuals by targeting groups. That’s why I’m bothering to argue with you guys, because I see y’all have empathy you’re just misled into thinking Xi and Putin (two of the richest most powerful men the world has ever seen) actually are interested in your well being. There are many MAGA people in your same situation that think Trump is interested in their well being. They’ve been told their enemy is minorities, you’ve been told your enemy is everyone not wanting to destroy America at any cost and not all about sucking Xi dick.

    And there we have it. Like clockwork, the chauvinism that plagues the western left rears its rotting head. Absolutely incapable of looking at things from another perspective, especially when it comes to foreign policy. Ignoring the homophobic/problematic aspects of this tirade, why do you believe that you can completely disregard history? because the american leftist project is going to supercede anything those damn others do? I don’t like Putin, you’d find a significant portion (if not majority of the people on this site) don’t, but I actually pay attention to history and don’t let myself be dragged around by the nose by the US state department. Most of my attention is in my immediate surroundings and community. I am, in fact, not motivated by fucking xi or putin you goddamn weirdo, I’m motivated by the fucking horror show that is the USA. I’m motivated by my friends who were murdered by the state. I’m motivated by the fact that we have fucking full blown nazi acceptance in the west (yes, by the dems). Again, if you want to vote for dems, I don’t fucking care, but don’t expect roses and applause when you get in people’s face about bullshit while the world is crumbling around them.

    • kool_newt
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      How can you even marginally support the dems if this is your ideology? So you don’t think people should organize around socialist concepts? what kind of anarcho-communist are you? because even if you decry all extant orgs as “statist” presumably you are organizing (if you actually are) with leftists… every socialists/communists/anarchists who I have organized with wouldn’t bristle at being called socialist in a casual context

      Socialism and communism are terms without firm commonly understood meanings. I was using socialism as “on the path to stateless moneyless communism” - it’s a way of using the state in more cooperative way vs an exploitative way, but it’s still state oriented. As an anarchist, I’m not really that interested in promoting groups who want power. But I’m not really “against” people organizing in socialist contexts (I’m actually in the the DSA and RSA), again, I don’t promote state power. I don’t brisle at being called a socialist in a casual context. I would not call our conversation casual.

      Also to be clear, as an anarchist, I vote because I’m also realistic and don’t think a successful anarchist revolution is around the corner and I want my miinority and POC comrades to avoid the wrath of fascists while I work on furthering my goals in other ways.

      The rest of your comment is full of insults, straw men, and other fallacies and I have to work.

      • RollaD20 [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        You don’t think that posting on a random forum is casual? Antagonistic sure, but also definitely casual. I use socialist in person all the time in order to get around sectarian bullshit in contexts that are much more formal than an online forum lmao.

        You blunder into a room (full of minorities) to proselytize that everyone must vote for dems to support trans people and then dismiss a markedly anti-democratic and anti-trans action, deferring entirely to the singular authority of a man who you claim to be a detractor of. You use your ‘anarchist creds’ to attack the left with uncritical, ahistorical analysis, but won’t criticize the establishment when there are quantifiable actions to criticize. You attack left orgs with basically zero institutional power for being pro-state whilst defending the literal US government. You resort to homophobic attacks to assume I am a useful idiot for foreign governments and perceived boogeyman and that I am no different from a Trump supporter. You don’t even bother mentioning how dem support for literal nazis factors into your support. You don’t respond to others who make compelling arguments against your tired points. Why the hell should I respond to you with anything other than dismissal?

        • kool_newt
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Sorry for the necro reply, I’ve been away from Lemmy mostly.

          deferring entirely to the singular authority of a man

          Biden is not a dictator, I don’t know why you’d say this.

          You blunder into a room (full of minorities) to proselytize that everyone must vote for dems to support trans people

          Are you assuming I’m a white man? Are you assuming your minority voice is more important than my minority voice (trans, gay, Mexican (daughter of immigrants), atheist, woman)? Why am I not allow to encourage people to vote for a candidate that has demonstrated support from trans people when the other choice has demonstrated contempt for trans people? Even if you think voting is pointless, you telling me I don’t have the right to try to protect myself in a way that seems useful to me seems like a shitty attitude. What is your goal?

          …you use your ‘anarchist creds’ to attack the left with uncritical, ahistorical analysis, but won’t criticize the establishment when there are quantifiable actions to criticize…

          You think I’m an anarchist that won’t criticize the establishment? You’ve assumed much in error. Anarchism is a criticism of the establishment, any establishment. Just because I didn’t go into the atrocities of U.S. history in my comment you think I’m gung ho America? lol Get out of your bubble and realize there are more than Marxists and Liberals.

          You resort to homophobic attacks

          What? lol

          and that I am no different from a Trump supporter

          I see you as acting like a Trump supporter, yes. You follow rich powerful men that tell you some group is the problem, not them hoarding resources. The only real difference is that Marxists clearly have empathy while the right is based in a lack of empathy.

          You don’t respond to others who make compelling arguments against your tired points

          I have been away for a bit, but I’ve replied to most of y’all’s tired points.

          Why the hell should I respond to you with anything other than dismissal?

          I don’t mind if you don’t respond, you do you.