A malicious law enformement officer or a criminal can exploit copyright laws to prevent criminal activities to be posted on mainstream platforms. Read the article for a real life example.

No matter your stance on copyright laws, I think we can all agree there needs to be an exemption to copyright laws where if a video or audio recording contains copyrighted material but also contains unrelated content (like police violence or other criminal activity), then that should be exempt from copyright laws. Beside, who wants to listen to music that also has a cop screeching in the background, therefore, this wouldn’t affect music subscriptions services in any way.

Even with such law, I don’t have hopes of youtube changing their policies. I’m honestly sad for the future.

  • 001100 010010@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not a lawyer, but they need to make it absolutely clear that recordings that include copyright music shouldn’t be copyright infringement unless the recording is solely containing the music and nothing else. Like if someone is talking over it, it should be automatically exempt. (Most pirates wouldn’t talk over music just to avoid copyright laws. Most pirates are gonna want the original, high quality version, not one where there are people talking over it.)

    I think such a change would be acceptable to most people, even those who are against piracy.

    • Petter1
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly my thinking, how can a shitty recording take someone not to buy/stream music. The filter should not take down recordings of recordings, in my opinion. Nobody loses any money with this.