• horsey
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Why don’t you tell me what you think it is instead of “wrong”?

    I didn’t say “NATO was started to…” yes, it was founded to stop the Soviets from expanding and as a pact of mutual defense. Same thing. Obviously the USSR doesn’t exist now so that wouldn’t continue to be a goal.

    • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      NATO should have dissolved as an organization after it’s goal of thwarting communism from the Soviet Union was met. Because it’s real goal is capitalist hegemony it continues.

      • horsey
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t see why they would do that. it’s basically just an alliance of the US and EU. Are they capitalists? Sure, so what. I don’t see that changing any time soon. At the same time, the usefulness of a mutual defense between the two continues. Russia’s demonstrating that right now. If not for NATO, who else would they be invading soon? Belarus? Poland? Estonia? Why would NATO choose to dissolve and allow that?

          • horsey
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            What’s the alternative you’re suggesting? What major countries who rival NATO are not capitalist? They should cancel NATO and let smaller countries be taken over by capitalist Russia because the EU is capitalist? “NATO member countries should change their economic system” isn’t the same as “NATO shouldn’t exist”.