Huh, that dog is pretty much identical to my dog with the saturation turned way up. It’s uncanny. Justice for Xiaopang!

I think a lot of the shivering isles aesthetic holds up better. Lots of vibrant colors and weird shapes that made it a lot more interesting looking than Skyrim, which is just as outdated looking but also boring

Having a lot of dark thoughts reading that thread. They/theming people who don’t use that pronoun is absolutely misgendering. Even in queer spaces it seems that way, since I never notice the cissies getting it.

I get harassed in public and misgendered in queer spaces. Why do I bother going on if no one respects or cares for me

SMT negotiations are by far my favorite monster-collecting methods. Just equal parts philosophy, flirtation, and gibberish as they vibe check you.

I don’t know if it was from a mod, but when I played with a friend there was a modifier to disable failing out of songs, so we’d enable it on those songs and just swing along wildly as best we could, and still finish them. Also helped us get a lot better at the game. Maybe that would work?

I love James Acaster. His joke about the British Museum is one of my favorites.

What? Norm was always an “apolitical centris” at his best, and was usually far more conservative, who would frequently punch down, like when he

That’s the context for his “I think everyone involved in this story should die” quote.

He stayed conservative, defended trump and attacked #MeTwo towards the end of his life. Other than like one 9-11 joke, I don’t see any reason why leftists would want to claim or defend him?

Add duplicates of badly named ones with new standardized names. And filter out the old ones from the emote picker so they don’t get used much again.

He’s very aware of the origin too. Later in that conversation he added:

Chivington might have been quoted as saying “nits make lice,” but he is certainly not the first one to make such an observation as it is an observable fact. If you have read the account of wooden Leg, a warrior of the Cheyenne tribe that fought against Custer et al., he dispassionately noted killing an enemy squaw for the reason in question.

Cheers,

Gary

To pick a nit – last I heard, no scholar believes that runes can be read, pronounced, or that we have access to any ancient tradition of meaning. Modern runic divination is based on intuitive interpretation – well and good, but a flimsy basis for reconstructing lost languages and cultures.

Am I just not understanding the authors point or is this like, completely wrong? Linguistics is a real field, and there has been a lot of study into runes and the Germanic language family (probably too much study, considering the issue with Eurocentrism throughout linguistics). Wikipedia is pretty detailed about the different eras and how the runes were pronounced and changed.

The point about modern Runic Divination being vibes based looks to be true, but it seems wrong to bring it up unprompted and conflate the two.

Haven’t seen the video myself and definitely not gonna now, but people under that post were saying that was plagiarized too from a Vanity Fair article.

Looks like going back to old English, strawberries were still berries. The botanical meaning was only added in the 1700s.

So blackberries, raspberries, tomatoes, pineapples, strawberries, and eggplants are all berries

Looks nice, but it fucks up the ligatures in a lot of functional languages other than pipes |>. Poor <$>, >>=, *>, >>>, and all their friends

That sucks. Where I live this is pretty much the only way since we ran out of injectable estrogen for a long time, and the pharmacies here won’t tell us if they can re-order it so I don’t know if the drought is over.

Edit: this prompted me to call around and see if one would answer. Walgreens is claiming they can, but they did that last shortage too.

I didn’t want to pick a fight with 5e people, but we found it unsalvagable and moved on. Anything kind of campaign we could run in it would work better in some other system we know.

No one I know has played Pathfinder 2e since the playtest, but the low success rates and weakened spells made it feel like a very slow slapstick comedy. I heard some of that was from math issues that were later fixed.

We are considering trying it again, but I keep on getting caught up on the loss of things I loved in 1e, like constant flight or not having to take actions for your minions.

I think spell slots are really neat when you take advantage of them like 3.5/Pathfinder did. Each slot was prepared separately, could be left unprepared and then prepared out of combat to adapt to the day, and had lots of metamagic options to make use of different level slots.

But by the time of 5e, slots don’t seem to have any purpose beyond lowering caster flexibility. When we were playing we ruled spontaneous casters could use spell points instead of slots to give them an edge up on the prepared ones.

3.0/3.5/Pathfinder also used Power Points for its psionics instead of slots, and that worked very well. Shame 5e doesn’t have psionics.

Ooo, we just started a Pathfinder Dark Sun campaign, so this is good timing! We are weak and low level now but still plotting to destroy the local slavers (what Dark Sun is really about)

“This woman has come in contact with Tokyo’s manga. She is Unclean and would lead we righteous ones astray.”

• Merkabah, Shin Megami Tensei IV

Chauncer and Shakespeare use singular they, while the push for gender neutral “he” was much later, in the 1700s and 1800s. So from this view singular they is descriptive of how language has been used for hundreds of years, while arguing that it’s a mistake or wrong would be prescriptive. And this is just anecdotal, but everyone where I live uses singular they (at least for unspecified gender people), even my grandma who uses old words and has heated elder moments.

But even if singular they usage was brand new, I wouldn’t consider advocacy as a form of prescriptivism. Prescriptivism usually comes from places of authority over language, like education and publishing, and states what’s right and wrong to use. I don’t see he-or-she being defined as incorrect by advocates of singular they, just clunky and exclusive. Not so much “this is wrong” as “we can do better than that”. An appeal for niceness and understanding, rather than an accusation of improper language.

People stop using words and phrases all the time, both intentionally or just picked up from their environment. Some words become offensive and others become disused, leading to them falling out of favor, and new words are coined all the time, sometimes as direct replacements. Just the inevitable evolution of language.

Wikipedia does state that it may include politically correct language under the label, but I don’t normally see that used in linguistic discussions in my experience. I would be hesitant to include that under it, since it seems to kinda stretch the definition to the point of not-super-usefulness where asking someone to stop saying slurs or correcting your name could be seen as prescriptivism. But of course, language is determined by its speakers, so if you would include those under it go ahead.

Sorry that was pretty rambly, but basically I don’t think its prescriptivist to ask someone to change their language to not hurt others.