I’m 99.999 percent sure that there is no afterlife, but I wish there was, especially for people like this man. Rest in power. You will be avenged in the coming years and decades.
I’m 99.999 percent sure that there is no afterlife, but I wish there was, especially for people like this man. Rest in power. You will be avenged in the coming years and decades.
I’m aware. And I like that phrase you used.
“How many times do we have to teach you this lesson, old man!?”
I hope so. Do you live in Nepal? Not that it matters, just asking.
Hopeful but I’ll believe the end of the conflict is near when I see it. I’m not gonna celebrate a victory prematurely. That’s what my urologist told me.
I thought it was a meme of psychically sleeping with deployed soldiers and their partners as well.
Marx’s Captital sounds like a porn parody.
Shut the fuck up cracker.
I’ve read on Twitter that the various Nepalese communist parties are neoliberal/opportunists. I don’t know and I doubt that it’s true, the account I read that from seemed suspicious.
“We didn’t boil any babies! That’s slander! We just killed them and boiled villagers alive!”
I read that the early Communist Party of China received some CIA support (namely money and guns) to finish off Chiang-Kai Shek’s fascist/nationalist movement during the later periods of the armed struggle.
I’m still not quite sure what to think of the Khmer Rouge, but I read that they did collectivize agriculture.
“China is turning everyone trans!”
I’m somewhat neutral/leaning towards being supportive of the death penalty, and I understand your sentiment. And I’m not trying to be a contrarian or sound like a smug “know-it-all” or edgelord.
But I genuinely want to ask, can you really say that the death penalty isn’t a necessity on some level?
I do think and hope that the death penalty will be used less at least in a socialist society, but my opinion is that it should always remain an option.
I am aware that it is a great tragedy that as many as 4 percent to 15-ish percent of those that are executed by the state are innocent of their charges. And I am aware that a lifetime in prison can arguably be “worse” and a more fitting punishment for the convicted.
I’m of two minds: I think the death penalty should be reserved for the most heinous crimes where there is a mountain’s worth of evidence and nearly no shred of doubt, and if the person is a genuinely dangerous threat that refuses to respond to treatment, therapy, education by work and humility.
I don’t understand how/why the death penalty should ever be completely removed as an option or last-resort.
I am aware that China for example supposedly has long-term plans to stop the use of capital punishment, which I think is fairly commendable.
I’m also aware that when capitalism is overthrown, crime and violent crime will drastically decrease.
I’m talking like, in regards to people like unrepentant rapists/pedophiles, reich-wing agitators like Steven Crowder or Ben Shapiro, people like Peter Scully, Shanda Vander Ark. I don’t see the benefit in letting them live.
I hate this mentality. Refusing to give a dangerous group, individual or ideology and public visibility is often a double-edged sword or the wrong move. Ignoring a problem doesn’t make it less harmful or go away.
I think of worse, but I at least don’t mention it out loud
I don’t see the problem here. Both characters look and are in their 20’s.
Would be badass if true.