It matters because, while any underlying facts may be true, the article can present the facts in an inaccurate way or a way that suggests an incorrect conclusion.

Breitbart is a fantastic example.

All I’m asking for is a bit of nuance beyond “communists are saying nazi things”. Being similar is not being the same. You’re implying that Palestinians are Nazis, which is… a tremendous stretch.

Fair point, I oversimplified a bit. Sounds a bit more of a nationalism issue?

Again, you’re painting with a broad brush. Nazism and antisemitism are frequently associated but mutually exclusive.

And one person’s terrorist is another person’s freedom fighter.

While some of the comments from commies are too far, just because you disagree with how Israel treats Palestinians doesn’t make you a Nazi.

You can approach this situation with more nuance than a choice between “Jews bad” or “Muslims bad”.

*Münster uprising

I was extremely confused trying to remember if Dan did an episode about mustard. But yeah that ep was brutal and entertaining!