• UraniumBlazer
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    While I support the idea of cracking down on religious extremism… Should we be linking Breitbart articles? You know… Basically the alt right?

    • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      The fact that you got downvoted twice over this says a lot. Breitbart is not a credible source and never has been, and you don’t need to be partisan to know this.

      • trespass
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        It matters because, while any underlying facts may be true, the article can present the facts in an inaccurate way or a way that suggests an incorrect conclusion.

        Breitbart is a fantastic example.

      • UraniumBlazer
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        What trespass said, but also this: When we link the article, we expand the amount of people that it reaches to. Two things happen due to this:

        • The brand name of Breitbart becomes known for a person, likely without critical thinking.
        • Breitbart earns more money, as more clicks translate to more revenue through ads.

        Hence, by linking their articles, we directly end up supporting them.

  • ThrowawayOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    Im honestly not surprised they were let in in the first place. But its still a bone headed move.