• intensely_human
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Nope. I think that nobody is terrorizing anyone by receiving clear answers.

          • intensely_human
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I understand risk and security, sure. I carry a weapon everywhere I go because I understand it intimately.

            I just object to the idea a person is “being terrorized” by that situation. As if all the people interacting with them are terrorists, because they are too confused about their relationship to their own fear and safety to carry a weapon.

            I got terrorized by one person once, and now I keep that weapon on me at every moment I’m not behind my own locked doors. I do not believe that I am being terrorized, simply because I live in a dangerous environment.

            Words have meaning, and the meaning matters. A person who is anxious is not, thereby, being “terrorized”.

            “Schrodinger’s rapist” indeed, as if the concept of a dangerous environment didn’t exist before the year 2010 when that term got coined by people who think they’re the first to encounter the world.

            • richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              coined by people who think they’re the first to encounter the world

              Yet another US asshole who feels like John Wayne with his fucking gun and lacks the minimal empathy to be considered a decent human being.

              Get bent.

              • intensely_human
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Yet another leftist whose response to disagreement is to dehumanize the other.