• Neuromancer
    link
    English
    -3
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Other articles I’ve seen were worded differently. They were clear we won’t attack Iran

      • Neuromancer
        link
        English
        -11 month ago

        We - Americans. They Israel

    • @CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Yeah, that’s what I worry about. Usually when it comes to the US on Israel “wouldn’t support” means “would silently disapprove”.

      • Neuromancer
        link
        English
        -11 month ago

        I have seen nothing to suggest we will cut aid or weapons. Just we won’t directly attack Iran.

        I’m pro-Israel but the best way to end the escalation is to stop sending weapons at this point. I don’t see Iran attacking again unless Israel counter attacks.

        We need to say stop it and make it clear, you counter attack and we cut aid.

        Iran cannot invade Israel. Israel cannot invade Iran. Israel attacked a consulate. They started this and we can stop it

        • @CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I thought that said “weren’t” for whatever reason. Yeah, that’s good then.

          I’m not sure other pro-Israel people would call that pro-Israel, but I agree.

          • Neuromancer
            link
            English
            01 month ago

            Allergies. It’s possible there are some typos. My eyes are on fire. Pro-Israel doesn’t mean pro-escalation when they act poorly. We have rules to how the world works and they violated those by attacking the consulate. Now they are trying to escalate a conflict with Iran.

            We don’t need a war in the Middle East right now. We can reduce that by reducing aid.

            American has become so partisan. You can support something but still have a redline.