• @tsonfeir
    link
    English
    7010 days ago

    I want a $10000 car that would normally be inflated to $30000 in the US.

    I’m no lover of China, but fuck the capitalist auto companies.

    • @Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4110 days ago

      That $10k Chinese car cost $20k to make. A competitor undercutting the market that much leads to monopolization. When that competitor is being bankrolled by a foreign government it’s potentially even a hostile act.

      People have been mad for decades about what Walmart did to retail in the US. Taking steps to prevent that from also happening with the auto industry should be appreciated.

      • @exanime@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        59 days ago

        People have been mad for decades about what Walmart did to retail in the US.

        And the government stepped in and addressed the situation, right? Right?

        • Liz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          109 days ago

          They fucking should have. I’m not gonna give China a pass just because Walmart got one.

      • @tsonfeir
        link
        English
        -410 days ago

        When they show me their manufacturing costs, I’ll believe that.

        • @fuckingkangaroos
          link
          English
          1610 days ago

          You’re going to be waiting a long time to get reliable numbers out of the CCP.

          • @tsonfeir
            link
            English
            010 days ago

            I mean the other car companies who overcharge.

          • @bamboo
            link
            English
            -210 days ago

            [citation needed]

          • @tsonfeir
            link
            English
            -1610 days ago

            That’s all car companies.

    • Buelldozer
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3210 days ago

      I want a $10000 car that would normally be inflated to $30000 in the US.

      You can’t make that same car in the United States for anything like the same price. Even ignoring the Chinese Governments heavy subsidies there’s still a massive cost gap due to worker compensation, cost of compliance with safety regulations, cost of compliance with environmental regulations, and a whole host of other things.

      The cost of manufacturing in the United States is radically higher than it is in China and that simply isn’t fixable unless you’re going to unwind Union pay deals, remove environmental laws, and reduce safety restrictions.

      You cannot have both, so which are you choosing? Are you going to go with your wallet like a self absorbed capitalist or are you going to support union workers, stronger environmental laws, and more worker safety?

      • @karpintero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2510 days ago

        This is what I try to tell people who just want the cheapest things possible. We’re voting with our dollars what kind of world we want.

        Also, shipping things across the sea burns some of the worst fuel for the environment so I’d rather buy things made here and support the local economy whenever possible.

        • @exanime@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          29 days ago

          This is what I try to tell people who just want the cheapest things possible. We’re voting with our dollars what kind of world we want.

          Ok, please tell me where can I buy <insert anything here> that’s wasn’t totally or partially made in China??

          I’m an avid learner and DIY, I try to only buy raw materials and tools to make everything I can myself … I have yet to see standard basic tools that were not made in China…

          I understand your point, but to expect that “voting with your wallet” will cause change, is like hoping we can turn around a cruise ship by blowing at it

          Just look at the enshitification of everything… Did people vote that in with their wallets? Or all services decided that on greed and left us no choice but to hold our noses or give up the last few vestiges of entertainment that we could still afford?

      • Veraxus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        so which are you choosing?

        I think most people will choose what they can actually afford. The fact that things cost so much and people aren’t being paid anywhere near enough to compensate for the skyrocketing price of consumer goods, including vehicles.

        Whatever the reasons, there is a very serious and dangerous disconnect between the prices of American goods and the spending power of the average American. Unless we do something about that - and I do not mean short-sighted, punitive, protectionist measures like tariffs - China is going to drink our milkshake.

        • @jaemo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -19 days ago

          Maybe the problem is our lifestyles. I’m unaware of any long term studies suggesting that in a situation in which the population increases and the resources and land are fixed, that it gets cheaper for anyone wanting anything.

            • @jaemo@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              8 days ago

              Nope. This just seems patently obvious to any but the dull-witted or anyone whose paycheck depends on denial of some fairly basic facts.

              (Edit: the downvotes only prove to me that “Idiocracy” was actually a documentary that fell backwards in time)

      • @JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        10
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Thatsthething.

        Everyone talks about how shitty the environment is and that we’re going to get burned alive in our lifetime…but at the same time, fuck the environment if it means cheap goods.

        Here’s some fun math. Burning a gallon of gas emits 8,887g of CO2. Let’s call it 8.9kg. 1000kgs in a tonne. That means 112 gallons emits a tonne of CO2.

        With me so far?

        It costs around $500 to remove a tonne of CO2 from the atmosphere.

        People act like $3/gal for gas is too much. I say, it’s nowhere near high enough. Gas has to cost $4.46/gal just to cover cleaning up the CO2 emitted from it. That’s just cleanup.

        Maybe if we had to pay the cost for our lifestyle, we’d readdress what we actually need. Instead, we have government subsidized global destruction. All of the EV/renewable tax rebates are great (as long as you can use them)…but it’s nothing compared to what oil gets.

        Don’t even get me started on beef.

      • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        810 days ago

        Mexico is just across the boarder, and US car makers already make their stuff there to save cash. Mexico has a pretty low unemployment rate right now, so pushing even more labor demand their way would help improve a lot of peoples’ lives by lifting salaries.

        But a lot of the cost is in battery manufacturing, not assembly. We need to experiment with sodium-ion batteries to bring those costs down for economy-class cars, just like China is. Maybe $10k is too little, but $15-20k should be feasible for a very basic car.

      • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        29 days ago

        You do understand they have to comply with our safety and environmental standards to sell here right?

      • @exanime@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        19 days ago

        Sure we will take the sacrifice… I’m sure this time capitalist will get the message and start behaving reasonably

        It’s like that time thousands of us reduced or eliminated meat intake and suddenly the Kardashians realized taking private jet flight to avoid a few minutes of traffic was bad and stopped doing it

      • @bamboo
        link
        English
        -110 days ago

        While I can’t say any of this is wrong, you’re missing likely the single biggest component inflating the cost of US manufacturing: profit margins. Every step of the supply chain has a profit margin attached. Sometimes just a few percent, but often double digits. These compound, so a 5% margin on a simple component will see an additional 15% when sold as part of an assembly, which is then marked up another 20% when sold as part of the finished good. There’s also financialization which burdens US companies. Companies generally need to take loans to fund their operations, and end up having to pay heavy interest fees and rent which also drives up cost. Workers and environmental protections are more expensive, but in practice they are relatively minor compared to a lot of other inefficiencies US industry struggles with.

        • Buelldozer
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1010 days ago

          Every step of the supply chain has a profit margin attached. Sometimes just a few percent, but often double digits.

          That’s true in China as well. The only difference is in the price of what is being marked up.

          • @fuckingkangaroos
            link
            English
            110 days ago

            Well, there’s also less corruption and more free competition to lower pricesin the US.

              • @fuckingkangaroos
                link
                English
                39 days ago

                You think there’s more corruption in the US government than the CCP? That China’s market is more free? Give me a break.

                • @jaemo@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -1
                  edit-2
                  9 days ago

                  Doesn’t the USA have much higher wealth inequality than China’s? If so, is that not the result of corruption? If not, so you consider the visible symptoms of it?

                  • @fuckingkangaroos
                    link
                    English
                    19 days ago

                    As I said, I’m talking about the US gov vs Chinese gov.

    • @Novi@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1110 days ago

      I was born into a car centric society. So much so they design the places we live around them. Including dense residential far away from employment that requires transportation. Chop all attempts at decent public transit and now you have created a market of completely artificial demand. Which the law says cars must become more expensive. I have to have a car because of the awful design choices made by unqualified politicians past. Fuck the auto industry. They could have been out saviors by being the example of what union companies do but instead chose violence.

    • @Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      410 days ago

      It’s not the capitalist auto companies who are going to get hurt though. The price advantage of the Chinese companies comes from low labor costs and government subsidies, so the auto companies will just move there production to whatever country offers the most subsidies and least labor costs because in our current globalized world capital can move freely.

      The real losers will be the unionized auto workers who’ll be abandoned while capitalists maintain or even increase there profits in the third world. These sorts of race to the bottom always harm workers, whether it be with clothes and shein , or EVs.

    • @PhlubbaDubba
      link
      English
      310 days ago

      Ah yes, great way to fuck over our capitalists, by supporting their worse capitalists instead

        • @Buttons@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          20
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          US auto makers were like “we love the free market”, then people bought cheaper cars from China and they said “wait, not that free!”

          • @Lavitz@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            810 days ago

            No ethical way to spend in a capitalist society. It kind of is what it is, cause I gotta eat. Also certified “you criticize capitalism yet you live in it moment” to you sir.

            • @nymwit
              link
              English
              110 days ago

              are all unethical choices equal? Surely there are better and worse things?

                • @nymwit
                  link
                  English
                  18 days ago

                  Where I was going was: effects can be different even if all choices and results are unethical. If one cares about the possible impacts of ones actions, consideration beyond “well it’s all unethical, so whatever” could be warranted.

                  • @Lavitz@lemmings.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    1
                    edit-2
                    7 days ago

                    You tell yourself whatever you need to to live in this society and be happy. I’m sure the extra $.80 you’re spending for the label that says cruelty free, is in fact cruelty free.

        • @PhlubbaDubba
          link
          English
          -110 days ago

          My guess that the prior comment either reflects an assumption that non western capitalists are somehow better than western capitalists or that China’s capitalists aren’t a capitalist class.

      • @tsonfeir
        link
        English
        -210 days ago

        Maybe I want “our capitalists” to change.