• Call me Lenny/LeniOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    They might as well just require a license for people to go searching for things. And what if the artifact is made of wood?

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Untill someone makes a wood detector I don’t think they are worried about it.

      The point is that a metal detector is specifically made to find stuff easier, and significantly cuts down on manpower needed to find stuff, increasing the risk of scavanging.

      • Call me Lenny/LeniOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Do they have a license to stop dogs from being trained on the scent of certain materials?

        • stoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Nope, not to my knowledge.

          I have never heard about that being a problem or even a thing.

      • Call me Lenny/LeniOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        What about other materials? I should’ve been broader than wood, but what if for example it’s a gemstone? Not everything is going to be metal I assume.

        • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          If you ever go to a museum and look at what artifacts they have from the dark ages, it’s like 99% metal stuff. Just statistical I guess. I think even a gemstone would normally be attached to a piece of jewelry and not just loose on its own. The other big one is pottery and other earthwares, but I guess the idea of that law is to protect whatever they can.