Artist behind controversial piece in Linz cathedral says vandalism shows there are still ‘people who question women’s right to their own bodies’

Vandals have beheaded a sculpture of the Virgin Mary giving birth to Jesus on display in the cathedral in the Austrian city of Linz. The work had drawn criticism from some Catholics, who said it was blasphemous.

The sculpture had been on view at the St Mary Cathedral, Austria’s largest, as part of an art installation about women’s roles, family images and gender equality, the Linz diocese said in a statement. It said the vandalism, which occurred on Monday, had been reported to police.

The identity of the vandals was unknown. But Alexander Tschugguel, an Austrian traditionalist Catholic responsible for the so-called “Pachamama” act of vandalism during the Vatican’s 2019 Amazon synod, said in a social media post on Tuesday that he had been contacted by those responsible.

Tschugguel praised the “Hero of Linz” and posted what he said was a statement from the anonymous vandal explaining the motivation. The statement implied that the person’s emails and calls to the diocese to complain about the sculpture had been ignored.

  • shasta
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Hold up. The artist thinks the Virgin Mary is a good example of women having a right to their own bodies? This is a woman who was supposedly forcibly impregnated by a god. What bodily autonomy does her story exhibit?

      • shasta
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        It’s fine to be Christian. I just don’t understand how the artist’s quote is relevant in any way to this piece of work they made or the defacement of it. The closest I can fathom is that it’s a woman. The logic ends there.

    • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I’m not sure if it’s the artists intention or not, but it gets at the heart of a lot of misogyny. What could possibly be controversial about Mary giving birth? It’s an interesting question to put to the (mostly) men who decry the installation.

      • IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I think they resent the reminder that a woman gave birth to their god. A woman having that kind of power and authority is abhorrent in their minds.

        • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          But when the set time had fully come, God sent his Son, born of a woman, born under the law,

          Galatians 4:4

          They should read their own book in that case.

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Oh it’s a great story about the lack of autonomy.

      Warn your kids against Christianity, the entire religion is predicated on rape. Jesus is a rape baby. Full stop.