• Llewellyn
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    It’s devaluing, because Boebert named diversity as a reason to hire Karine, not her professional qualities.

    • Bibliotectress@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      You forgot the implication that black women couldn’t possibly be skilled or smart enough to be hired. Because they’re black. That’s the racist part. It’s devaluation stemming from racism.

      • Llewellyn
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        3 days ago

        It appears that Boebert has said that about particular women, not all of them.

        So I wouldn’t necessarily imply racism here. Common devaluation - sure.

        • orcrist
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Bad chatbot. You can’t switch between sexism and racism without even attempting to connect the two.

          • Llewellyn
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Ok.

            It appears that Boebert has said that about a particular women person of colour, not all of them.
            So I wouldn’t necessarily imply racism here. Common devaluation - sure.

            Is that better?

            P.S. My first language is Russian, and we usually refer to a 3rd person by it’s gender. That’s why I defaulted with “woman” instead of more broad “person”.

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      you’re almost there… just explain what kind of diversity and you should arrive.

      • Llewellyn
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        DEI is not racism (in theory). It’s a tool to fight one (in theory).

          • Llewellyn
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            English isn’t my first language. Maybe that’s the case.

            • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              The original poster was saying that Lauren Boebert is racist for calling her a “DEI Hire”… not the concept of “Diversity, Equity and Inclusion”.

              • Llewellyn
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                3 days ago

                I just was being lazy and didn’t type the whole “DEI hire”. But I’ve meant it.

                I think, being called “DEI hired” is not necessarily racism but a common devaluation / belittlement.

    • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Because one, LB has no idea of the qualifications or hiring process involved. And two, even if she did, believing the DEI is not a requirement to overcome racism in hiring is continuing to empowering racism. It’s still a big problem, whether it’s impacted you or not.