• jimbolauski
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    26 days ago

    Worked as in controlled prices yes, but it did not work for the economy. Rationing controlled demand but as costs to produce went up skimflation was used. Meat manufacturers started filling sausages with crackers and potatoes. Meat producers stopped producing after Congress reinstated price controls after ww2. The biggest problem is that ending price control saw inflation skyrocket in order to catch back up. Farm bills were used to curb this.

    • NeuromancerM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      26 days ago

      It is funny how liberals don’t understand economics at all. I have seen them call for the ending of farm subsidies.

      They don’t seem to grasp, that would create wild swing in the cost of food and the poor would be hammered.

      • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        24 days ago

        Depends on the crop and the farm. Subsidies for domestically grown/sold food? Yes, I’m all for subsidies.

        Subsidies for things like alfalfa that is mostly shipped out and sold over seas? Fuck that. Why are we subsidizing China’s economy? We are essentially paying for them to steal our water supply.

      • jimbolauski
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        25 days ago

        Farmers have been vilified by the left so they are out to get them. They don’t take time consider what would happen if farm bills were removed.

        • NeuromancerM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          25 days ago

          I would like to see us get back to more family farming over corporate farming. Corporate farming is bad for the supply. It’s often so specialized