I don’t see them saying it was okay. Seems pretty obvious they’re just correcting the “AI” part of it, since it is in fact inaccurate (she received the images she’s talking about 7 years ago).

In the legal sense and clarity of AI scrutiny it’s important what we pin on the movement of “Ai” and what is on a pervert taking hours on a photo editing software. The explicit imagery is disgusting either way, but a headline screaming “Ai images led this famous actress to delete Twitter in disgust and shame” vs “some pervert created photoshopped images of Ortega that led her to delete Twitter” changes the perspective of where our outrage is. Don’t mistake it, image generation via prompts should 100% be controlled, but using this event to promote outrage towards that with misleading headlines isn’t the way.