Is it good employer strategy to pay my employees just enough so that they can’t save money, so that they can never walk away from the job?

Like, there is a threshold where if they are able to save X per month, they will eventually use that against you and quit at an inopportune time?

And if that threshold falls below state mandated minimum wage, what steps can be taken to mitigate this?

  • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    3 months ago

    It is a terrible employer strategy that all but guarantees you will have a high turnover rate as people use their off hours to find better paying work.

    It also ensures any public you have to face will consistently be interacting with a work force that could not give any less of a fuck, because you are literally not paying them enough to.

    The only conceivable way this is a good business strategy is if you are either a short term seeking nepo baby, get all your business advice from one, or are yourself a complete and utter drooling moron who has never once taken even a beginner’s course in proper employee retention.

    Do. Not. Do. This.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Doing this is the kind of advice Boston Consulting Group would give shortly before Citadel cellar boxes your company.

      It’s a seriously bad idea. pay shit, get shit employees. It will see OP’s company providing shit service, cost more in both turnover and having to fix the shit that their shit employees shat all over, as well as driving customers away.

      It’s also immoral.

        • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Is Walmart typically known for having highly skilled, dedicated workers?

          Or desperate folks that would leave for another opportunity without a second thought?

          I guess, “it works” but I wouldn’t say it’s REALLY working.