• HelixDab2
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Lead in gasoline was a stop-gap solution. If I remember correctly , it was added because we didn’t have the technology at the time to refine gas sufficiently to get the octane levels necessary to prevent pre-ignition of fuel (which causes rod knock) at a reasonable cost. Tetraethyl lead effectively increased the octane level/resistance to pre-ignition. As a side benefit, the lead slightly lubricated the valves and valve seats so that they lasted for tens of thousands of miles, instead of needing to be reground every few thousand miles.

    It was a stupid stop-gap though, esp. since the dangers of lead were well known by then.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      You’re mostly correct. It was an additive to raise the octane rating and did lubricate. However, it wasn’t a gas refinement issue that caused the need. An octane boosting additive has been needed ever since, right up to today. Now the octane booster used is ethanol, mostly.

      Race cars and many airplanes still use lead. We’re still making people dumber. Just at a lesser scale.

      • Flocklesscrow
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        If you want a sad rabbithole, look at the cancer rates around small airports, which are often much closer to where people live.

        • 667@lemmy.radio
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          While it’s no consolation to these current people, they are trying to make the switch to lead-free aviation fuel. It’s partly a regulatory nightmare, and partly a genuine safety challenge; mandating a fuel change in aviation without adequate research and understanding can result in unexpected engine malfunctions.