• OldWoodFrame
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    10 months ago

    The “evidence” is literally just a meeting between white house staffers and Special Counsel staffers, months before Trump was indicted. The article goes over the actual purpose of the meeting, but like even in the most dastardly interpretation what’s the complaint? That the White House “knew” about the investigation? Everyone knew about the investigation!

    And there’s no reason a meeting proves anyone approved or disapproved anything, but I think I’m safe in saying Biden approves of the prosecution, you don’t need to meet with some low level staffers of his to find that out.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      << puts fingers in ears >>

      LA LA LA I CANT HEAR YOU FAKE NEWS ELECTION INTERFERENCE COVFEFE MAGA!!!

    • thefartographer
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      Meetings are always nefarious, deal with corruption or treason, are generally are an attempt to collude with foreign bad actors. Ask Trump about his perfect meeting with the Russians.