• ex10n
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    7 months ago

    Not really, the US has been pumping the breaks on Israeli aid because of the indiscriminate bombings in Gaza. The US believes the civilians in Gaza have a right to their territory as a 2 state solution is desired.

        • riseuppikmin [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          41
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Actions are more important than words. The U.S. is going out of its way to expedite the artillery needed to continue Israel’s indiscriminate bombing of civillians in its ongoing genocidal campaign against Palestinians.

          Please I am begging you do not take these organizations at face value- read what the poster above you sent and recognize the distance between the statement “You need to comply with international law more closely” and the action: here is a way for us to get you bombs for you to use more quickly.

          If on one hand part of the state apparatus is signaling for “restraint” but the state is accelerating its ability to provide weapons that its calling for restraint in use of the actual stance is clear: what you’re doing is fine by the state.

          • ex10n
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            7 months ago

            It’s alright, we can agree to disagree. Biden has criticized the Netanyahu government for their treatment of Palestinians. More should be done to ensure their safety, hence the conditial provisions of arms, but the United States policy stance has clear ambitions for a 2 state solution. Neither Hamas, nor the Netantahu government are okay with this, however it remains the United States ambition. I truly hope we can see this conflict resolved in my lifetime.

              • ex10n
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                7 months ago

                As far as I’m aware, the US has not fired any weapons on Gaza soil. There’s been some defensive strikes to the north in Lebanon, but that’s it. Seems like a stretch to call the United States complicit when it’s goals do not align with the Netantahu government.

                  • ex10n
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    7
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    Vetoing a ceasefire in an active war does not change states policy and actions, but you can spin this however you’d like and we can agree to disagree. There’s nothing wrong with disagreement, it just spurs the need for thoughtful discourse.

                  • ex10n
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    Sounds like we can agree to disagree, there’s nothing wrong with that when democracy reigns!

            • brain_in_a_box [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              21
              ·
              7 months ago

              You still haven’t been able to back up your claim that the USA is putting the breaks on it’s aid of Isreal because of the genocide. All you’ve done is point to the US going “we’d like it if you slowed down on the genocide, but we’ll 100 support you if you don’t” and tried to equivocate that as being the same, when it really isn’t.

              • ex10n
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                7 months ago

                I said pumping the breaks. There’s still legitimate concern for the removal of Hamas as the acting government of Gaza. Neither Hamas, nor the Netantahu backed Israeli government want a 2 state solution, however this remains the US states policy. Whoever can broker a deal that affirms a 2 state solution here will hopefully produce meaningful change towards this conflict.

                • brain_in_a_box [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  I said pumping the breaks

                  Doesn’t change anything about my point.

                  There’s still legitimate concern for the removal of Hamas as the acting government of Gaza

                  Incorrect. And you don’t see the USA sending endless, unconditional, military aid to Palestine so they can remove the Israeli government.

                  Neither Hamas, nor the Netantahu backed Israeli government want a 2 state solution

                  Hamas explicitly calls for a 2 state solution you lying ghoul.

                  this remains the US states policy

                  Not true, not until the US recognises the state of Palestine.

                  Whoever can broker a deal that affirms a 2 state solution here will hopefully produce meaningful change towards this conflict.

                  Going to be pretty hard to do while Isreal and the USA are committed to genocide.

                  • ex10n
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    US aid is conditional to congressional support. Currently there’s debate on the issue at hand. Doesn’t remove the impact humanitarian aid has provided in the region. The 2 state solution has always been the desired solution here in the states. That position has been unwavering.

            • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Did anyone ever tell you the saying “actions speak louder than words” as a kid? Now apply that to state actors. No matter what words their US uses, no matter their criticism, their actions are very clear.

    • الأرض ستبقى عربية@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      The US is bankrolling the genocide and vetoed the ceasefire. Who are you lying to? The US and its interests are a fair and legitimate targets because of its involvement and complicity in the genocide.

      Joe Biden Moves to Lift Nearly Every Restriction on Israel’s Access to U.S. Weapons Stockpile https://theintercept.com/2023/11/25/biden-israel-weapons-stockpile-arms-gaza/

      Don’t be fooled. Biden is fully signed up to ethnic cleansing in Gaza https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/israel-palestine-war-gaza-biden-fully-signed-up-genocide

      • ex10n
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        7 months ago

        As a defensive partner it makes sense to continue to provide aid and arms to Israel for defensive purposes, which includes the removal of a condemned terrorist organization as the acting government of the Gaza strip. This does not reduce or remove the US effort to provide aid and humanitarian support to the citizens of Gaza. A 2 state solution remains the policy of the United States, even if this is a foil with both Hamas and the Netantahu government.

        • الأرض ستبقى عربية@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          defensive purposes

          You wouldn’t say this if it was Russia bombing Ukrainians. I’m gonna blame this on racism against Arabs. No other reason to describe the murder of 18,000 civilians and the bombing of schools and hospitals as defensive.

          condemned terrorist organization

          Citation needed.

          According to Wikipedia the countries that consider it as terrorist are only than 13% of the world’s population. That doesn’t seem like much condemnation when 87% of the world aren’t on board.

          • ex10n
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            7 months ago

            Russia has been and is currently bombing Ukrainians on sovereign land. Pretty easy to learn this tidbit of information.

            • الأرض ستبقى عربية@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              23
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              And the Palestinians are bombed where? in the skies? they are being bombed on their own land that was stolen from them, and in the refugee camps they are forced to live in. Internally displaced on their own land.

              • ex10n
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                7 months ago

                Was this supposed to draw a response? Can you reiterate your question?

                  • ex10n
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    6
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    Palestinians are not a target of bombings in Gaza, they’re sad casualties of the realities of war and conflict. Bombing non-military targets is never okay, but there’s limits to the precision of weapons in use today.

        • DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I want you to consider this comment and compare it to your previous comment above. You said that the US is reducing spending on Israel because of Israel’s brutal actions. Then when it was pointed out to you that they in fact were doing the opposite, your response was not to then say “wow, that’s really shitty of them” but instead to try and justify their actions to yourself.

          Have you no brain? No heart? No soul? No spine? Is this really the person you want to be? Someone licking the boot of the dickhead politicians in Washington so much that you’ll abandon any and all morals to do so? It’s ok to be mad at your government when they do shitty things, even if they are “your team.”

          • ex10n
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I will not discuss this further with you if you’re going to use language like that. I appreciate the understanding to promote positive discourse!

      • ex10n
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        You can cast doubt but it still stands it’s official policy.

          • ex10n
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            It doesn’t recognize the current government in Gaza, sure, for good reason! However it remains US policy to work towards a 2 state solution.

              • ex10n
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Correct, as the current acting government, Hamas, uses terrorism as a tactic to guide policy change. The US will not succomb to these barbaric tactics. The US is in favor of a 2 state solution though civil discussion and mutual agreement, much like I’m trying to encourage here in this community!

                  • ex10n
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    No, not contradictory and I explained why above. See above ^

                  • ex10n
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    I don’t know what you mean by bit but, I’m just trying to promote thoughtful discourse!