we need teleportation frankly

  • berg
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    … if we could figure out scanning and printing at the atomic scale, with zero defects

    I think this is a bigger issue currently than sending large amounts of data across the globe. Though I wonder how much data a full copy would demand.

    • Deceptichum@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      You just made me curious and we’re not alone in wondering

      To have a scanner that can record the position of every atom in the body to an accuracy of the order of the size of a hydrogen atom would require position accuracy of about 10-10 meters. To get that accuracy over a distance of order 1 meter, this would require 30 decimal digits, which would be about 100 binary digits per atom. However, there would be a lot of redundancy in this data, so let’s be optimistic and assume you could compress this down to 1 bit per atom, so we still need approximately 1027 bits of data to just specify the positions of all the atoms in a human body. According to Wikipedia (Exabyte), the approximate data storage capacity of all the computers and storage devices in the world today is roughly 1 zettabyte = 1021 bytes = 1022 bits. Therefore, the data for the scan of one human would require at least 10,000 times the total storage of all the data stored on Earth right now.

      https://slate.com/human-interest/2013/05/is-teleportation-possible.html

      • papalonian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I was getting incredibly confused because the copy/paste didn’t copy the superscript for the exponents. I was like, “there’s definitely more than 1027 atoms in the body… wait, how are there supposedly only 1021 bytes of storage in the whole world? Oooh…”

      • Xariphon@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Now I’m wondering how long it would realistically take for that to become a not-insane demand. I know data storage multiplies pretty rapidly, but not that rapidly, so are we talking decades or centuries?

        • Deceptichum@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Apparently we can already do it, a gram of dna can store 215 petabytes and we can encode to dna at 18Mbps.

          Gonna be a long upload.

      • berg
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Ah, that would take a while to send 😁