ByteWizard to Conservative · 9 months agoConservatives vouching for Trump even more after knowing he “banned” Epstein from Mar-a-Lago years agowww.msn.comexternal-linkmessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down142
arrow-up1-36arrow-down1external-linkConservatives vouching for Trump even more after knowing he “banned” Epstein from Mar-a-Lago years agowww.msn.comByteWizard to Conservative · 9 months agomessage-square39fedilink
minus-squarejimbolauskilinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·9 months agoIt was a funding bill not a bill making human trafficking illegal.
minus-squarejimbolauskilinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·9 months agoNot supporting a funding bill does not make someone pro human trafficking.
minus-squareNeuromancerMlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·9 months agoOften when bills are rejected it is because there is pork in there. The way to fund it is through normal law enforcement or by submitting a bill without the pork.
minus-squareNeuromancerMlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·9 months agoThat is because Democrat love to spend money they don’t have.
minus-squareNeuromancerMlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·9 months agoJust mirroring your equally worthless reply. You seem to think nobody was handling this issue before they put in a bill. If you had read the objections to the bill, you’d get why they voted against it.
It was a funding bill not a bill making human trafficking illegal.
deleted by creator
Not supporting a funding bill does not make someone pro human trafficking.
deleted by creator
Often when bills are rejected it is because there is pork in there. The way to fund it is through normal law enforcement or by submitting a bill without the pork.
deleted by creator
That is because Democrat love to spend money they don’t have.
deleted by creator
Just mirroring your equally worthless reply. You seem to think nobody was handling this issue before they put in a bill.
If you had read the objections to the bill, you’d get why they voted against it.