The article they cited was a press release from Jim Jordan about a letter he wrote to the FBI director Christopher Wray, so I’m not sure why they think they cited a DOJ report.
I am not ignorant on the topic. Use your words and tell me the value of the box article. From the exert you posted , it doesn’t say anything that refutes my viewpoint or what I’ve said. So why should I read liberal garbage when it’s not relevant to the topic?
Facts and evidence? Biased liberal garbage.
But you’re not a conspiracy theorist? Lol
How does the Vox article dispute the DOJ report I cited?
It doesn’t
That’s my point. Read the article. Or at leat read what I quoted. Jesus.
Then why do I care what a lefty rag mag has to say about it? If it doesn’t refute anything I have said then who cares?
I cannot believe you are willingly this ignorant.
The article they cited was a press release from Jim Jordan about a letter he wrote to the FBI director Christopher Wray, so I’m not sure why they think they cited a DOJ report.
Read the citations In the release. The agent knew the laptop was real and still reported it as Russian disinformation.
But you called it a DOJ report.
You linked a press release from Jim Jordan that briefly mentions an attorney with the Department of Justice who sat in the interview of Laura Dehmlow.
Why are you calling it a DOJ report?
Do you dispute the fbi knowingly and willfully interfered in the election ? In the article, what are you disputing?
I am not ignorant on the topic. Use your words and tell me the value of the box article. From the exert you posted , it doesn’t say anything that refutes my viewpoint or what I’ve said. So why should I read liberal garbage when it’s not relevant to the topic?