I understand when people speak about the ethical problems with eating meat, but I think they do not apply to fish.

  • intensely_human
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    There is loss of fish experience I guess. Or, lack of it. There is no fishly life being lived out, after you quietly kill the fish.

    But then who are we to not spawn as many fish as possible, to maximize this good called a fish’s life?

    What if we kill the fish without pain or warning, and cause two new fish to be born. Does it pay for the killing of the fish?

    • Call me Lenny/Leni
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      It pays back to the world but not to the fish whose life we took. They will forever have to deal with unjust effects inflicted upon them.

        • Call me Lenny/Leni
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          The same can be said for when anything is dead, but that doesn’t mean it’s enough to make us choose death.

        • Call me Lenny/Leni
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          The same can be said for when anything is dead, but that doesn’t mean it’s enough to make us choose death.