• FUCKRedditMods
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    131
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    “Violating international law” is pretty sterile/soft verbiage for fucking war crimes.

      • regul
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        What do you mean? Jewish politicians are the only ones allowed to even mildly criticize Israel, because anti-semitism claims against them are taken slightly less seriously.

        • cobra89@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          9 months ago

          Spot on. Bernie has been called an anti-Semite before, he will probably be called one again for this and I’m sure it won’t be the last time he is called one.

      • He denounced specific parts of the attack. The section of international law that explicitly allows violent resistance to a military occupation or blockade doesn’t exempt the resistors from the rest of international law. The IDF/Israel and Hamas have the same obligations under international law(s).

      • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Yeah last I checked shooting up music festivals isn’t tho…

        Every Hamas supporter seems to have this same cognitive dissonance.

        Is Israel genocidal? Absolutely

        Is hamas genocidal? Absolutely

        Stop supporting genocide and claiming to be a leftist. You’re really just an extremist pos.

        Yes, Israel has the advantage. No, that doesn’t make terrorism any less bad.

        Stand with Palestine but denounce Hamas at every single opportunity, just as we should denounce the genocidal government of Israel at every opportunity.

        • the_kid@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          serious question - if Jews in a ghetto during WW2 got together some weapons, revolted, left the ghetto and killed a bunch of German civilians partying right outside the ghetto, would you call it “genocidal” and “terrorism” and say “yes, while Nazi Germany is bad, so are these Jews who committed terrorism”?

          • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Yeah, I’m pretty sure I would. Mindless violence is never a good thing…

            Most German citizens were not nazis, just as most Israeli citizens aren’t in favor of genocide. A powerful and motivated political minority is a scary thing indeed, kinda like Repubs in the US, or the current leaders of Israel, or Hamas, or the countless far-right Renaissances happening across Europe rn. Need I go on?

            Again, I don’t disagree that Israel is genocidal. That doesn’t mean mindless violence and genocide in return are anywhere near the answer. There’s a reason MLK would leave cities if protesting turned into rioting. Even when you have the right answers, turning to violence isn’t a solution.

            Does it suck to take the high road all the time? Yeah. Do you have to do it to not fall to the same level as the opponents? Also yes.

            • the_kid@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              it doesn’t suck for you to take the high road, you’re sitting in the west living a comfortable life, it’s super easy for you to ‘condemn’ both sides and go on with your day. what are Gazans supposed to do? they’re living in hell on earth, and the entire world had turned their backs on them.

              peacefully protest? they’ve tried that

              try to get the word out about how bad their situation is? they’ve tried that

              what should they have done instead? just do nothing and let Israel keep building settlements and murdering them and commit a slow genocide? I can’t blame them for violently struggling in whatever means possible. even under international law, occupied populations have the right to engage in armed struggle. it sucks that it came to this, but Israel is responsible for every death that happens because they want to commit genocide against the native population rather than peacefully coexist.

              • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                Occupied populations absolutely have the right to engage in an armed struggle, just not the right to murder…

                I do sit in an ivory tower here, but so do you, and that doesn’t make either of our words ring less true.

                Take the words and actions of MLK, somebody who actually accomplished great social change while not living in that ivory tower.

                Hate begets hate.

                • brain_in_a_box [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  "First, I must confess that over the last few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro’s great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen’s Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to “order” than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says “I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can’t agree with your methods of direct action;” who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man’s freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a “more convenient season.”

                  Shallow understanding from people of goodwill is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection."

                  -MLK

            • PosadistInevitablity [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              The Jews would have been justified in killing every German they could get their hands on if it could help stop the Holocaust.

              A genocidal society has no right to claim the mercy of a civilian/soldier distinction. They do not recognize it themselves.

              It is a horrible tragedy on a personal level. No one person has any power over the situation they find themselves in, but that is the brutal logic of war. Societies will feel less safe in engaging in targeting civilians if their own are subject to retaliation when they do so.

              • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                But would it? No.

                It wouldn’t help stop the holocaust, only create death and destruction, that’s kinda the whole point…

                The death of your brother doesn’t make you want to forgive his murderer and instead radicalizes you more deeply against him.

                Is Israel stopping the targeting of citizens now? No! They’ve cut off water and electricity to Gaza again.

                Hate begets hate, dumbfuck.

            • brain_in_a_box [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              9 months ago

              Sitting on the side lines whining about “both sides bad!” during the literal Holocaust is not “taking the high road.” It’s being an unprincipled coward.

              And MLK had pretty scathing words for people like you.

              • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                It’s not “both sides bad”

                It’s “murder of civilians and children is murder of civilians and children, even when it’s an oppressed group fighting back against oppressors.”

                The fact that you can’t tell the difference tells me a lot. I’d also argue that it shows you to be the unprincipled one.

                • brain_in_a_box [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  That’s just “both sides bad.”

                  The fact that you can’t tell the difference tells me a lot.

                  And the fact that you can’t tell the difference tells me even more.

                  I’d also argue that it shows you to be the unprincipled one.

                  smuglord

  • undercrust@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Once again, massive swinging dick Bernie Sanders is one of the few bold enough to actually spit truth, no matter how much shit he catches for it.

  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Sanders also reiterated his prior condemnation of the Hamas attack, calling it a “major setback for any hope of peace and reconciliation in the region – and justice for the Palestinian people.”

    There was never any hope of peace and reconciliation and justice. 🙄

    • Bnova [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah I have no idea how these people don’t get it. Are the Palestinians expected to just accept having their calories counted and reduced, their water limited, and their electricity shut off? Like what sort of peace do you think is possible?

      • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        No, not with any knowledge of the last 70 years in the region.

        Extremists on both side of this conflict want nothing but the extermination of the other and have been saying so for decades.

        The world has been trying to broker any sort of solution for all that time but the political leaders on each side do not believe the other has a right to exist.

  • atetulo
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    So glad zionists don’t control the narrative this time.

    It seems like the internet is doing it’s job, for once.

    • Jack.@lemmy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      They do sadly. The media has repeated Israeli lies again and again even when provided with no proof of their claims. The whole baby beheading thing got spread so much that Joe Biden ended up calling it out and later clarified that they don’t have proof as well.

      And Reddit has been banning pro Palestine subs and users from yesterday.

      • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        I sincerely doubt they’re banning “pro-palestine” subs and users and are banning the ones supporting Hamas and mindless violence. Reddit is far more anti-zionist than any other social media, for example.

        Not to say that the Israeli propaganda machine isn’t running, but there is definitely a portion of antisemitic backing for Hamas (not Palestine) that’s going to get places banned for not following reddit’s sitewide rules about hate (just have to use some dogwhistles to get around it tho).

    • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      While it’s still evil as fuck to see so much both sides garbage, I have yet to see anyone outright supporting the Zionists in this.

      • atetulo
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        9 months ago

        I think saying Israel has a ‘blank check’ to do whatever they want to Gaza is ‘outright supporting Zionists.’

    • FluffyPotato
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      9 months ago

      More than one thing can be true. Hamas killing civilians is bad. Israel carpet combing civilians is also bad.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    “For many, it is no secret that Gaza has been an open-air prison, with millions of people struggling to secure basic necessities,” Sanders said in a statement issued on Wednesday.

    “Israel’s blanket denial of food, water, and other necessities to Gaza is a serious violation of international law and will do nothing but harm innocent civilians.”

    Sanders also reiterated his prior condemnation of the Hamas attack, calling it a “major setback for any hope of peace and reconciliation in the region – and justice for the Palestinian people.”

    Sanders is among the most prominent Jewish politicians in America, and during his presidential campaigns in 2016 and 2020, he was notably far more critical of Israel than most Democrats.

    His comments are largely in line with those of progressive “Squad” members in the House, who have called for a cease-fire in the wake of the Hamas attack.

    Some of those lawmakers have also used the word “apartheid” to describe Israeli’s occupation of the West Bank and blockade of Gaza, a term that’s used by numerous international human rights groups but is largely eschewed by American politicians.


    The original article contains 385 words, the summary contains 185 words. Saved 52%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • RaincoatsGeorge@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    9 months ago

    I know the rawness of such a vicious terrorist attack will cloud judgment and leave the Israelis furious and wanting blood. For any American who fails to understand this, imagine if 9/11 had been caused by a group of people living in a cordoned off part of New Mexico. We would have carpet bombed the ever loving fuck out of it and killed the majority of the people there. The only reason we didn’t have a swift full force military response after 9/11 is because we had to get assets to the region which took time.

    I’ve watched these videos of Israel dropping buildings left and right. I certainly hope these are confirmed terrorist targets but there’s just a whole lot of them and I suspect many of them have civilians inside. I know we are currently in the ‘Israel can do no wrong and we stand by them’ phase but where is the line drawn? Does this terrorist attack justify genocide? Im not inclined to believe so. But I also know after 9/11 I wouldn’t have given a shit if we did genocide an entire group if they were responsible. I would have been wrong, but my point is we lived through that seething rage ourselves and it took us years to collectively calm ourselves.

    I don’t know what the answer is. Obviously they have to respond. But what’s the line you draw? It would not surprise me if in a few months the opinions of the global public once again shift back to horror and condemnation of Israel as the reality of this response is made public.

    • Bay_of_Piggies [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      72
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      But I also know after 9/11 I wouldn’t have given a shit if we did genocide an entire group if they were responsible.

      Wtf.

      You assholes DID do that, 3 million dead and millions more refugees.

      If the people did 9/11 were Indigenous Americans living in an open air prison beside New York city, facing regular bombings, food shortages, lack of clean water and electricity and a constant encroachment upon their land, yeah little sympathy when they kill a couple settlers for once.

    • wombat [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I also know after 9/11 I wouldn’t have given a shit if we did genocide an entire group if they were responsible

      liberals just can’t stop telling on themselves

      • RaincoatsGeorge@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        Really? That was what I learned from Fox News. Since my parents turned it on and never turned it off.

        Wait. Did… did you just tell on yourself by accident? That is hilarious.

    • regul
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      9 months ago

      You know the US does have groups of people cordoned off in New Mexico? We have similar situations all over the US. They’re called Indian Reservations and we did regularly massacre the people that lived there (Wounded Knee being the most famous example).

      But at least by 1924 we gave Native Americans citizenship and therefore the right of free movement. It only took about 150 years but they at least got basic rights eventually, even if the discrimination and violence continues.

      Israel can’t even meet the standards of decency that America, a continuously not-decent country figured out for itself before Israel even existed.

    • Sasuke [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I also know after 9/11 I wouldn’t have given a shit if we did genocide an entire group if they were responsible.

      you have hitler living inside of you

      • 31337@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I think one of the main lessons from Nazi Germany (and various old psychological experiments), is that everyday, average, people are capable of horrifying acts. This is especially true for kids who haven’t fully developed empathy yet (this is one reason child soldiers are used, gangs are mostly children, etc).

        I was around the same age as the poster when 9/11 happened, and had the same thoughts, and many of the kids I knew had the same thoughts as well. I lived in the “country” outside of an all-white, pretty racist, very small town and had christian fundamentalist parents; which probably shaped my views when I was a child. I remember once in school, we had to do a presentations, and one group of kids did a presentation about turning Afghanistan to glass; which got laughs and no reprimands from the teacher.

    • Cummunism [they/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I also know after 9/11 I wouldn’t have given a shit if we did genocide an entire group if they were responsible.

      @ in username

      every time.

      fuck right off, you piece of shit.

    • PosadistInevitablity [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      People like you absolutely cannot be allowed anywhere near the levers of power in any society.

      Your mindset is responsible for so much preventable suffering and you think it’s universal for some reason.

      That deeply saddens me how warped your perception of reality must be.

      • RaincoatsGeorge@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Oh don’t worry that’s already happened.

        It’s precisely because I can be honest with myself and you can’t that they handed me the keys but couldn’t trust you.

        Society is full of people who talk, few who can act. You learn quickly who falls where.

          • RaincoatsGeorge@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I think my favorite is the guy who has responded to everything I’ve said like 8 times. You guys are great.

            Why do you want to know? So you can try and cancel me? Call my boss, or at least what you think is my boss and tell them about me? I mean go nuts. Show them what I’ve said. The thing that makes this all so unbearable for people like you is that I’m the same here as I am in person.

            Do you think I am like you? Pretending to be this or that and then sneaking home to don some persona on the internet? It’s embarrassing. I don’t say one fucking word if I don’t mean it. That’s in person, that’s online. It means I don’t have to keep track of all the little half truths you tell, the silly little story you have invented.

            I’m an asshole. You’re right about that. But there isn’t anything you can do about that. You know why? Because I made sure I was really Fucking good at something that people like you couldn’t stomach. So there will always be another job for me.

            It affords me the liberty to tell the truth. To piss off little shit dicks such as yourself. If you do not like that, too Fucking bad.

      • RaincoatsGeorge@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Absolutely true. The discussion was more about which resources and financial benefit would be best for the people in the room.

        Maybe not in every one of the rooms. But the one that mattered, you better Fucking believe.

    • Maoo [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      “I supported genocidal rage, tried to psychologize and implicitly justify other ways to genocide, gladly accept and repeat the racist language of double standards that allows Westerners to pretend they don’t already support apartheid and genocide, but don’t you dare call me a Nazi.”

    • Jack.@lemmy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      This is a horrible take.

      I’m only allowing it to stay up because it’ll give others an eye opener of what Israel supporters are really like.

      • RandomException@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m curious, what exactly gives a sense of OP being an Israel supporter? I read the post as good pondering about the reasoning for Israel’s reactions and some good analogy for US readers through the 9/11 attacks and reactions for it.

        It’s pretty much required that a nation will either defend themselves or even counterattack heavily if someone attacks them or otherwise they won’t stay independent very long (see Ukraine currently or Europe in 1930-1940s) and understanding that doesn’t make someone automatically a supporter of either side. Now, it’s a good thing to discuss about the size of Israel’s reaction because completely destroying another country over a terrorist attack is not going to end up well either. This is something where the 9/11 comparison works well in my mind.

    • muddi [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 months ago

      I know we are currently in the ___ phase but where is the line drawn? Does this ___ justify genocide? Im not inclined to believe so.

      The line is genocide, if nothing else. The blanks don’t matter. Your position on genocide should be 110% against it, the extra 10% (ideally more) being proactive measures to fight fascism to ensure genocide never happens again in history.

    • barsoap
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 months ago

      ITT: People who can’t tell an explanation from a justification.

  • SoyViking [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    9 months ago

    Palestinian resistance: “absolutely condemn”, “horrifying attack”, “no justification”, “it must end now”

    Zionists doing Nazi shit in Gaza: “a war crime”

    Fuck off you old piece of shit

      • PosadistInevitablity [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Akin to the Warsaw uprising. People facing extermination rising up hoping to avert ultimate doom at the hands of uncaring monsters.

        They knew how outmatched they were, but the alternative is submitting to genocide. Think about the desperation required to take this nearly hopeless fight. The sheer suffering.

      • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I would describe the actions of the Palestinians as, hmm, let me just do a stream of conscious word association here:

        based heroic justified correct good successful hopeful kickass revolution freedom

  • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    For a public statement by a U.S. Senator it is about as critical of Israel anyone could expect. I would wager far moreso in fact.