• LGOrcStreetSamurai [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    One thing I find very strange about the actually existing information age is that most “tech” doesn’t even solve a problem, or improve upon an existing system. It’s all just selling solutions to problems you don’t have or problems the seller created in order to sell you the solution. Most “tech” companies haven’t really made any improvements to anything they own in a long time. It think the it’s odd/frustrating that improvement to existing solutions is far less “valuable” than new “features”.

    It’s also interesting to me that “tech” companies aren’t even really technology companies anymore. “Innovation” is just a buzzword rather than actual goal/objective. They want to just make new “things” rather than actually improving any current things

    The modern age is weird and I don’t like it.

    • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s the problem with humans having limited needs while the market needs unlimited growth. The only answer after a certain point is inventing demand.

      • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        1 year ago

        for example computer chips are now cheap enough to put inside household appliances it just turns out that almost no one needs or wants that

        we could use this to create technology to assist the disabled and elderly caring for themselves but that’s not a big enough market so stupid bullshit it is

        • I would have bought so much IoT stuff if they were designed to use open standards and be part of an isolated home network. They could have had a sizable if niche prosumer market, but these companies wanna go public or get acquired, so that’s not enough.

        • LGOrcStreetSamurai [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          we could use this to create technology to assist the disabled and elderly caring for themselves but that’s not a big enough market so stupid bullshit it is

          It’s really frustrating that we have the know-how and resources to make technologies for making all sorts of people’s lives safer/easier/better but because it’s not “profitable” we don’t. It’s really maddening to me that we have all the assets and knowledge but not the will due to “THE MARKET©®™” deems it to be unprofitable.

          • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            yeah it’s pretty deeply tragic like the people dying in Africa of diseases that there are cures and vaccines for but copyright law and the fact they aren’t a big enough market to justify the cost of setting up a factory to make the medicine they need means they just die

      • invalidusernamelol [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        1 year ago

        And specifically, inventing demand by removing alternatives. Like with IoT devices. They invent demand by removing alternative designs, raise the price because it’s premium, then use those devices to spy on your and sell data to create a sort of rent based model where you pay with your privacy.

        Alternatively they just refuse to even sell you the IoT device and force you to rent it from them.

        • Shinji_Ikari [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          1 year ago

          IoT stuff is so frustrating, because the useful aspects are overwhelmed by the need to make it profitable. I DIY’d an environment tracking setup totally local on my network to keep track of things like temp/humidity because I’ve got some sensitive acoustic instruments and I need to know when they need to go in their case/get a wet sponge/break out the dehumidifier. Now I have a historical graph of temp/humidity/air quality cycles in my apartment.

          I bought a “IoT” power strip because I wanted individually addressable outlets for things like lamps and monitors and centralize the interface but fuckin TPlink took away the python API access and requires an account and so it sits in its box until I can possibly reverse engineer it enough to either write my own firmware or just hotwire the relays for my own purposes.

            • Shinji_Ikari [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              1 year ago

              The only way to control it currently is via an app you need an account for so it removes any ability to be an offline device. Its within my skillset to dump the flash and try to patch it, it should be running some embedded linux firmware going by the mediatek chip in the FCC declarations.

              I’ve just had other stuff going on and didn’t feel like dealing with it after the initial disapointment. There is the possibility of regaining the python api but that still requires making a tp-link account and connecting the device to the internet period, so I’m not a fan.

        • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          For what it’s worth, it’s not at all an original observation on my part, you can find it in Marx and co and in later writers like Guy Debord.

    • Sphks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      When Twitter came out, there were blogs. Everyone could write articles on their blog, ans RSS allowed everyone to follow anyone.

      Then a new company said : “We will make blogs, but limited to 127 characters”

      That was so stupid. I bet with a friend that it will never be a thing. I lost.

    • charly4994 [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 year ago

      In the latest quarterly earnings call for Tesla he got weirdly animated and emotional over work from home and it seems like he believes his own lies where he was sleeping on the factory floor for a while.

  • FuckyWucky [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    yea i don’t think employers have access to whether employees have an open bank account.

    e-wallets are not a bank replacement, it is used for small day to day transactions in any country.

  • Wheaties [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    your boss can’t tell you how to spend/save your money. If that headline isn’t hyperbolic, he’s opening himself up to lawsuits

    • bloubz@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      The article is about development of financial features into X, not changing employees banks. He wants to change YOUR bank