• oce 🐆@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’d replace scientist to something more precise like physicist because usually people consider mathematicians as scientists even if it depends on definitions.

    • milicent_bystandr
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      usually people consider mathematicians as scientists

      Yikes!

      … Wait, does this mean I can call a historian an artist? Then I’m game.

        • milicent_bystandr
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          In twenty years time they’ll rip into me on r/askhistorians

        • milicent_bystandr
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Usually (in my experience?) history is one of the ‘humanities’, which are more lumped with arts than sciences.

          • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yes it usually is, but I think the methodologies for modern history research is very much scientific.

    • Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Feel free! I actually just googled it because I couldn’t exactly remember it. I’d use contractions too and make it less formal sounding.