• TurtlePower
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Well, it’s been a long time so I have no idea if they still do, but Harmony made a phone app, you just had to buy their expensive-ass IR blaster kit that had a couple or so IR blasters that you stuck near your devices’ IR receivers. I’d rather have the Blaster in the phone and just download an app. And the app I had was just as programmable as the Harmony stuff.

    • yukichigai@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      That sounds like it’d suffer from the same problem a TV App would: if your network is having problems you suddenly can’t control your devices. The less intermediary connections between the controls and the device you’re controlling, the better.

      I mean that’s still kinda cool though, it just doesn’t sound like it’d solve this specific problem.

      • TurtlePower
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Harmony remotes use RF to communicate with the IR blasters, so no, there’s no network issues. As for the Harmony app…I never used it, because why would I pay a couple hundred for something that I could do with a free app that uses infrared so no network issues? That, though, would probably have network issues because I don’t think cell phones do RF other than Bluetooth and WiFi.

    • wjrii@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      The main thing for me is no-look tactility. I have a Roku remote app as a backup, and it’s annoying even with many fewer controls than the dedicated remote apps I’ve seen. I should be able to feel when my thumb has slipped over from the nav cross to the volume buttons. Different functional clusters should start in a sensible place and feel physically distinct from the other buttons, due to some combination of shape and placement.