• SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m having a conversation with you even though you are being dishonest and trying to put words in my mouth that I am not saying.

    If you feel that I am trolling you (which I’m not) then use your powers as a mod to ban and censor me.

    If you want to continue to have this conversation then I’d appreciate you not putting words in my mouth or accuse me of trolling you.

    I am simply disagreeing with what you say and providing evidence while I do so.

    • NeuromancerM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      If you feel that I am trolling you (which I’m not) then use your powers as a mod to ban and censor me.

      We are a light touch around here.

      am simply disagreeing with what you say and providing evidence while I do so.

      This is where your argument is circular. Maybe you do not realize it but let’s talk it through.

      My statement is that it is wrong for the FBI or any government agency to interfere with an election.

      You are saying you disagree with me.

      I then say I find it concerning you would support the FBI interfering with an election.

      You then say I am putting words in your mouth.

      It is either you find it concerning or you don’t. Otherwise, you would agree with me that it’s concerning the FBI keeps interfering with elections which is a danger to the Republic.

      Yet in your own words no, you haven’t provided evidence. The evidence is clear the FBI interfered with the election. I only know one poll that shows how it would have impacted the election but it’s a pretty shitty poll.

      I am simply disagreeing with what you say and providing evidence while I do so.

        • NeuromancerM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          9 months ago

          That is already proven. They lied about a material fact to avoid damage to Joe.

          They did the same thing with Hillary. That is a violation of federal law.

          Luckily for them Joe one and they won’t be prosecuted but it is just one of many ethical issues we are facing as a country.

          • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            It is not proven.

            If James Comey did anything to sway the election why wasn’t he charged?

            Same with the laptop, there has been no charges or convictions to do with it and there has been no charges or convictions of anyone surrounding it.

            • NeuromancerM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              9 months ago

              Imagine that, under Joe Biden, there haven’t been any charges or convictions against his son and possibly his involvement in a scandal. Who would have guessed that? The investigation is still on-going but I suspect until we get Biden out, we won’t see much on that topic.

              Comey was fired over it by the recommendation of the AG and Deputy AG.

                • NeuromancerM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Why the DOJ didn’t press charges is beyond my knowledge but it they terminated him over it.

                  The second incident happened then Joe became President. The investigation is still on-going.