I understand when people speak about the ethical problems with eating meat, but I think they do not apply to fish.

    • intensely_human
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      There is loss of fish experience I guess. Or, lack of it. There is no fishly life being lived out, after you quietly kill the fish.

      But then who are we to not spawn as many fish as possible, to maximize this good called a fish’s life?

      What if we kill the fish without pain or warning, and cause two new fish to be born. Does it pay for the killing of the fish?

      • Call me Lenny/Leni
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        It pays back to the world but not to the fish whose life we took. They will forever have to deal with unjust effects inflicted upon them.

          • Call me Lenny/Leni
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            The same can be said for when anything is dead, but that doesn’t mean it’s enough to make us choose death.

          • Call me Lenny/Leni
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            The same can be said for when anything is dead, but that doesn’t mean it’s enough to make us choose death.