Did automobiles replacing horses, diminishing horse population, diminishing horse suffering – as a consequence of work forced upon the animals. Is that moral win for horses; less suffering? Although their population is vastly smaller than 130 years ago.

  • Ashy@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Their population was unnaturally high and it’s better to not even exist in the first place than to suffer

    This guy PETAs.

      • Ashy@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’d rather be born into slavery than have some arrogant self-aggrandizing narcissistic cunt decide wether my life is worth living.

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        How’s that different from the human experience?

        You’re implying that literally all horses were abused, always.

        That’s incredibly stupid.

          • Dasus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            So literally all horses suffer, always?

            Have you ever worked with horses? (I’m assuming no, but I have to ask.)