LIberals supporting lynching.

  • Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Who’s outrage(d)? Normally it’s the liberals (who) are outraged. We are just having a discussion. That’s the difference.(,) Conservatives like to have conversations, liberals like outrage.

    A fox news article with a twitter post as it’s main source. Do you really think a conversation about this needs to extend further than ’ I changed my meds’ or ‘the doctors said it was a tumor, but my cousin Cletus said my head was always this big’?

    To generalize, as you have done, Liberals like facts and science, they do sometimes become outrage(d) when someone suggests shoving UV light up you arse to kill a virus.

    • NeuromancerOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      4 months ago

      No liberals do not like facts or science.

      Nobody suggested shoving uv light up their ass

      In one sentence you just dispelled your argument.

      You not only ignored the science but you ignored the facts.

      You do realize Trump was referencing a study going on to use UV light in the throat to kill Covid? Of course not because science and facts are things you dislike.

        • NeuromancerOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          4 months ago

          I just gave an example. The uv light clinical trials for Covid.

          • glimse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            You misunderstand. That is not an example of liberals hating science - the study was not verified (nor was it all that relevant for personal safety) when Trump talked about it and tons of his followers touted it as a cure anyway. Someone as illiterate as Trump should not be speaking about fringe science or giving medical advice

            • NeuromancerOPM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              4 months ago

              It isn’t fringe science. lol. It was clinical trials and a well known hospital.

              There was no study to verify. It was trials.

              Trump didn’t give medical advice.

              Biden did and gave wrong medical advice. He said if you get the vaccine you won’t die or catch Covid. That isn’t true then and it isn’t true now.

              • glimse@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                Fringe science was referring to invernectin, sorry for not being clear. But still - his cult took it and ran.

                Just because I dislike Trump doesn’t mean I approve of what Biden says, though.

                • NeuromancerOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Why are you talking about ivermectin? Do you even know what it is? I doubt it.

                  Trump didn’t suggest anyone take ivermectin, but he did talk about it. I think Trump likes to talk too much and shouldn’t have even talked about the topic, but it’s a long stretch to say he was giving medical advice.

                  I think we both agree it would have been better had he just shut up and same with Biden.