• Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Shit guys, turns out nothing is getting done without Dave here. I found Stan, but he will only do the job for twice Dave’s old salary. Let’s change our business model to a subscription service since it seems like everyone enjoys those anyway and give ourselves bonuses and negotiate Stan down to 130 percent of Daves salary!

  • unalivejoy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    8 months ago

    Dave started to realize his worth and get ideas, like asking for a raise, requesting time off, and demanding health insurance.

  • DogPeePoo
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    8 months ago

    At Goldman Sachs, everybody pictured would be Vice-President, including Dave.

  • zephorah
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Also a bit how working in the office instead of from home looks like.

  • User@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Soon Dave is gonna be an AI and it’s everyone else who’ll be losing their jobs

  • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    But real talk, why are construction sites always like this?

    Right now they’re doing work on a bridge over here and every day there’s either one dude out there doing nothin, or there’s a group of dudes scattered about doing nothing, watching one guy work. It’s no wonder this projects gonna take 5 years.

    • pearable@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      8 months ago

      A lot of construction is exhausting. You stand around the hole and take turns digging. By the end of the day you’re still ready to collapse.

      • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        Not only that but sometimes you gotta wait for someone else to finish their part before you can do yours.

        I never worked construction but having worked on other large, multi-entity projects, I’m sure there’s a lot of “hurry up and wait”.

  • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is how the government and government supported large corporations work. I dont even know how you think this is related to capitalism.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      8 months ago

      How a government in a capitalist country works perhaps. Certainly not how the government worked in USSR or how it works in places like Cuba, China, or Vietnam today.

      • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        8 months ago

        America is the least capitalist is has been probably in its history. Just because it was founded on something that was quite capitalistic doesnt mean it still is.

        Why not push for less regulations so that small business can thrive?

          • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            8 months ago

            And you keep encompassing more things in capitalism than belong. Why not push for less regulations so that small business can thrive?

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              8 months ago

              I’m doing no such thing. Capitalist competition necessarily leads to monopolies because successful businesses grow and as they grow it takes increasingly more up front investment to compete with them. On top of it they can just undercut small businesses or buy them out. The game of monopoly is a perfect illustration of how capitalism works. Everybody starts on equal footing, and at the end of the game one players owns everything. That’s how capital concentration happens in real life under the capitalist dynamics.

              Meanwhile, the government represents the interests of the class that holds power in society and passes laws in their interest. Under capitalism it’s the capital owning class. These are the people who own the media, pay for election campaigns, lobbying, and so on. And it’s not just me saying this. Here’s what a study analyzing many decades of US policy concludes:

              https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/perspectives-on-politics/article/testing-theories-of-american-politics-elites-interest-groups-and-average-citizens/62327F513959D0A304D4893B382B992B

              • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                13
                ·
                8 months ago

                I dont like monopolies either, but what monopolies are causing you the most harm? Mine would be the governemnt monopoly.

                I think you have fundamental mistake in that you seem to believe that the economy is a zero sum game but its just not how it works. The only zero sum game that I am worried about is the control of our rights with the governmnet.

                What specifically is it that you want peoples lives to look like?

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Government is not a monopoly the government is a management organization that resolves differences between capitalists. Meanwhile, if you can’t understand how capitalist monopolies cause harm then you’re beyond help. The whole climate crisis is caused by capitalist monopolies, just one example for you.

                  I think you have fundamental mistake in that you seem to believe that the economy is a zero sum game but its just not how it works. The only zero sum game that I am worried about is the control of our rights with the governmnet.

                  That literally has nothing to do with what I said which is that the economy works in the interest of the people who own capital, and these are the same people the government represents. You don’t even understand what the government is apparently.

                  What specifically is it that you want peoples lives to look like?

                  I want people to own the means of production. I want all businesses to be run as a mix of state owned enterprise and worker owned cooperatives. The state enterprise is good at providing common things everyone needs like healthcare, infrastructure, housing, and so on. These are things that need to be done regardless of profit motive. Meanwhile, private sector that’s owned by the workers is great at providing all the things where profit motive acts as a motivator. This isn’t rocket science.

        • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Less regulation is usually bad for small business. Rules against monopolistic / anti-competitive behaviour protect them from bigger rivals.

          • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            Regulation have nothing to do with monopolies, typically. Most regulations just make it harder for small business to do things so it benefits the big businesses.

            • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              A regulation that places a flat overhead or expense does create a disadvantage for a smaller business. But considering that the smaller business would have been bought up / bullied out in the absence of regulations, it is usually a small price to pay.

              • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                More regulation is more paperwork more expenses and more permissions/licenses, it definitely harms small business much much more. I can tell you this as a small business owner whos biggest issue is dealing with government regulations.

                • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Well, without those regulations to protect you you wouldn’t be a small business owner, so I guess they wouldn’t be your biggest issue any more!