• DucktorZee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    3 months ago

    I culture cells for a living. Not that these are the only ways, but the most common and effective ways to grow cells in the lab is to add either FBS (fetal bovine serum) or BSA (bovine serum albumin) to the culture media. Currently we don’t mass produce BSA in an animal free manner and FBS is by nature an animal product. Granted, that the products of one animal may in fact allow manufacturers produce more than enough ‘animal-free meat’ to overcome this but I haven’t seen any numbers. I’m interested in hearing more about these techniques going forward and in determining if animal-free products can really be produced animal free.

    • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      3 months ago

      Do you use Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) to make your meat?

      No, for a simple reason: we’re committed to making meat without causing any harm at all to animals. So we’ve developed a production process that doesn’t require FBS.

      That’s what they say.

    • intensely_human
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      What if it requires 1/1000th the number of animals … but each one suffers a hundred times more?

      Would it be worth it?

        • intensely_human
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          If you don’t have a way of quantifying suffering, perhaps all utilitarian calculus is bunk?

          • 0xD@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Unfortunately, I don’t really understand your response.

            You talked about one hundred times the suffering. What does that mean? To me, the way animals are held in mass production is completely unethical and there is no way to make it worse… So how do you make the animals suffer even more?

        • intensely_human
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Hence the word “if” here. A hypothetical scenario.

      • nickiwest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        From a utilitarian perspective, you’re still reducing overall suffering by an order of magnitude, so your scenario is still a greater good.