Big Tech is facing its biggest challenge in decades as antitrust regulators on both sides of the Atlantic crack down on alleged anti-competitive practices that could result in break-up orders to Apple and Alphabet’s Google, a first for the industry.

That in turn could inspire watchdogs around the world to pile on, as evidenced in the growing number of antitrust probes in various countries following the opening of EU and U.S. cases. Since AT&T was broken up exactly 40 years ago, no company has faced the possibility of a regulator-led break-up in the United States until now.

(EU antitrust chief Margrethe Vestager) said that requiring Google to sell some of its assets seemed to be the only way to avoid conflicts of interest as it would prevent Google from allegedly favouring its own online digital advertising technology services versus advertisers and online publishers.

Apple’s highly integrated system would also make a break-up difficult compared with Google, said lawyer Damien Geradin at Geradin Partners, who is advising several app developers in other cases against Apple.

“It seems to me much more complicated. You are talking about something that is integrated, for example you can’t force Apple to divest its App Store. That doesn’t make sense,” he said.

  • Stovetop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    “It seems to me much more complicated. You are talking about something that is integrated, for example you can’t force Apple to divest its App Store. That doesn’t make sense,” he said.

    Oh no we spent so long making our system incompatible with every competitor that it would just be too inconvenient if you made us take it apart. That’s not our fault!

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      If every other phone except for Pixels can use a third party app store, Apple can too.

      Not Google Play, though, for obvious reasons. Maybe F-Droid?

    • romp_2_door@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      no, you can’t.

      they’ll appeal any negative ruling for decades until the government gives up and offers them a slap on the wrist deal

      • metaldream@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        They can appeal all they want, but that doesn’t mean that courts will automatically stop enforcement actions.

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yeah, like that’ll happen. I remember the Microsoft antitrust trial. They were spewing the same bullshit about how they made IE integral to the OS. They just dragged the case out until they got a favorable administration in office that let them off with a slap on the wrist.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      I guess. I mean, it’s a travesty that more wasn’t done, but Microsoft WAS ordered to be broken up. And although that was eventually overturned, there were some pretty big oversight imposed. This all ended up having a pretty massive effect on Microsoft and its leadership and behaviors.

      …For 20 years, anyway. At this point leadership isn’t worried about it anymore and it shows.

  • DogPeePoo
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Of course most of Congress will make oodles of money inside trading on these decisions since they still can and do so regularly.

  • doublejay1999@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Too late really. Only been done a couple of times with any success, the rest were fudges in one way or another other .