Here’s a link to the news. https://e621.net/news_updates

Edit: As people in the comments pointed out, this bill targets all websites hosting porn. e621 just happens to be hosted in Arizona, and it therefore affects them directly.

  • barbara@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 个月前

    This is not a witch hunt against that site. It’s probably the only site residing in arizona that cares and which you visit. They could easily relocate, which they probably do if the bill is passed.

    • Kidplayer_666
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      6 个月前

      My bet is that it is a law against porn, and furry porn would be inside that

        • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          6 个月前

          It’s not outlawing. It’s inlawing.

          Wait. That’s something different. It’s regulating.

          No wait, that’s something different too. It’s “but think of the children!!!”

    • LWD
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 个月前

      Mostly the party of small government.

      They just want to keep children safe… from the LGBTs.

      • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 个月前

        From your article:

        Despite this, KOSA enjoys bipartisan support, including a July endorsement from President Joe Biden.

        The worst laws in the US are usually supported by both parties.

        • LWD
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 个月前

          But in reality, bigots tend to be Republicans.

          Is this you?

          • LWD
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 个月前

            In the same way living a full life is equivalent to suicide, sure.

        • LWD
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          6 个月前

          deleted by creator

          • LWD
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            6 个月前

            deleted by creator

    • OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 个月前

      I mean, laws like this don’t just effect furries. It’s a privacy issue for everyone in the state, and everyone who who usesa website based out of the state.

  • ji59@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 个月前

    …PUBLISHES OR DISTRIBUTES MATERIAL HARMFUL TO MINORS ON THE INTERNET FROM A WEBSITE THAT CONTAINS A SUBSTANTIAL PORTION OF MATERIAL HARMFUL TO MINORS…
    Since furry porn isn’t harmful, they should be ok.

    • blujan@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      6 个月前

      I don’t know the site that much, but I know that “harmful to minors” can mean anything.

      • FilterItOut@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 个月前

        Think of the children!

        I’ll believe they’re thinking of the children when they use that phrase to make laws that agree with the environmental groups and governing bodies.

    • Ignotum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      6 个月前

      How much is a “substantial amount”? There’s not thaaat much porn on e621, most of it is marked safe
      Well a lot of it is…
      Well some of it is…
      I’m relatively sure i saw one marked safe once…

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 个月前

      I’m pretty sure that viewing pornography can be harmful to young children.

      Not all “minors”, but some people forget that the phrase includes both 17 year olds and 4 year olds in some states…

      • LWD
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 个月前

        If a 4 year old is exposed to furry porn, I don’t think the culprit is the website.

        • otp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 个月前

          I didn’t assign blame to the website, or to anything. I just said that viewing sexual material can be harmful to children.

          • Gabu@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            6 个月前

            Which is the problem with completely open ended language, which is always used in such bills so as to only apply to whoever they want to persecute.

  • Gabu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 个月前

    At this point, I honestly expected it to have been moved to some European country… I mean, what site? Never heard of it.

    • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 个月前

      I don’t think that matters if they have a business nexus presence in that state. Like if (most of) the developer(s) working on it are in the state they could be subject to the law.

  • Titou@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 个月前

    Why not moving the website on another country/continement ? Or even better federating it