• 737@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      96
      ·
      7 months ago

      Endeavor os is an utterly pointless distro anyway, it doesn’t even host it’s own repos. Just use Arch.

      • NoisyFlake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        126
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        it doesn’t even host it’s own repos

        Yes, and that’s a good thing, otherwise it would be like Manjaro.

        EndeavourOS is perfect if you already know your way around a Linux system but don’t want to spend the time and effort to setup Arch.

        • aleph
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          39
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Technically, Endeavour does have its own repos but they only contain a relatively small number of non-essential packages. But yeah, other than that it’s basically pre-configured Arch with great defaults.

          • 737@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            7 months ago

            No, the defaults are worse than the arch defaults, the wallpapers are ugly, dracut has worse documentation for desktop use, yay is bad, and the firewall GUI is pointless bloat (the thing on the KDE settings app is just better). Just use Arch.

            • Fushuan [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 months ago

              It might be bad, but bad is better than nothing for tons of people. I would not have engaged with arch if it weren’t for eos, but now that I have I might switch to arch in the future, after getting a “transition layer” so to speak.

        • Petter1
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          You don’t know archinstall?? It’s on the normal ArchISO

            • burgersc12@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              7 months ago

              I found archinstall to be very simple to follow, even though the whole thing is shown through the CLI, its basically just one page where you setup everything like partitions, boot, etc. Was a lot easier than I expected with the way everyone talks about it

              • Owljfien@iusearchlinux.fyi
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                My only difficulty with it was that I have too many disks and partitions and I didn’t want to yeet the wrong one by mistake

              • Petter1
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Yea, it is a very simple CLI based TUI. And I prefer this over GUI in this case, to be honest.

            • ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Archinstall is TUI, it’s barely any more complicated than Calamares and gives pretty sane defaults and even the option to install DEs.

            • Petter1
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Sure, but do we call it archinstallOS, after installation?

              • exu@feditown.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                7 months ago

                I don’t get your point. Should we call EndevourOS Arch as well by your logic?

                • Petter1
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Yes 🌚 but don’t take me serious 😂

        • Allero@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          For the record, there’s nothing wrong with Manjaro either, it doesn’t deserve the Internet hate it often gets and I’m happy to use it as my daily driver.

        • 737@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Im not saying that it should, but not doing it literally reduces the distro to little more than an install script for Arch. Just use Arch with the archinstall script or the 10 minute manual install.

      • LeFantome@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        7 months ago

        EndeavourOS has its own repos and uses them to good effect to add small but important quality of life improvements to Arch.

        EOS also had the very good sense to not reinvent the wheel and reimplement the best thing about Arch ( the large, high-quality package library ).

        LMDE ( Mint on Debian ) is another distro that gets this right.